RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

threecount wrote:

jamiethekiller wrote:Independence Mall for the event tomorrow. Doors at 4. Has Springsteen and Bon Jovi.

With no SEPTA, the city will be a mess....

SEPTA strike is over and there will be full service tomorrow!

#riggedelection

Bucky wrote:it's because college educated folks are more likely to possess critical thinking skills.

Some final poll numbers from @QuinnipiacPoll:

FL Clinton 46-45
NC: Clinton 47-45
#FLSEN Rubio 50-43
#NCSEN 47-47 tie
#NCGOV Cooper 50-47

Items allowed: Voters with a legal right to carry a firearm may do so when voting unless the polls are located at a place where firearms are banned, such as a school or courthouse. Voters may not behave aggressively with their firearm or use it to intimidate other voters. Counties set their own policies related to electronic devices, such as smartphones. Berks County does not have any policy regulating electronic devices at the polls.

Voter intimidation: State and federal law prohibits people from harassing, threatening or discriminating against voters or otherwise interfering with voters' right to vote. Such behavior is a crime punishable by up to a $5,000 fine and up to two years in prison. Some examples of voter intimidation include:
Aggressive behavior in or outside of the polling place or using raised voices, offensive or threatening language, taunting chants or violence.
Blocking the polling place entrance or disrupting lines.
Confronting, questioning or demanding documentation from voters.
Photographing or videotaping voters to intimidate them.
Treating voters differently based on race or other trait.
Distributing false information about the election.
Confronting voters in an official-looking uniform.

Reporting intimidation: Voter intimidation should be reported to the county elections board and district attorney. Voters can also contact the state at 877-868-3772 or the U.S. attorney's special prosecutor at 215-861-8200.

Electioneering: Campaign materials cannot be distributed or displayed within 10 feet of the polling place entrance. Voters may bring campaign literature into the voting booth but must not leave it there. Voters, but not elections officials, may vote wearing campaign clothing or buttons as long as they do not draw attention to it inside the polling place. No campaigning can happen within the polling place.

Poll watchers: Credentialed through political parties and candidates. They may challenge voters but may not confront voters directly. Instead, they must voice concerns to the on-site judge of elections in the precinct. Poll watchers should not wear partisan apparel or buttons.

Challenging a voter: A voter's right to vote in the precinct can be challenged by an elections worker, poll watcher or another voter. The challenge must be addressed to the judge of elections, not directly to the voter. There are only two legal reasons to challenge a voter: The voter is not who he or she says he is or the voter does not live in the precinct. A voter's eligibility to register to vote cannot be challenged at the polls. The judge of elections may determine what is a "good faith" challenge. Challenging all voters is not allowed. Nor is systematically challenging voters of a particular race, ethnicity or other group.

How a challenge works: When the judge determines a challenge is in "good faith," the voter can bring another voter from the precinct to vouch for his or her identity or residency by signing an affidavit. After that, the voter can vote as normal. If the voter is unwilling or unable to find a witness, he or she can cast a provisional ballot.
Provisional ballots: Cast in cases when a voter's right to vote in the precinct cannot be verified, such as when a voter is challenged, does not appear in the poll book, goes to the wrong polling place, or does not have ID when voting for the first time in the precinct. Provisional ballots are sealed and are counted only after the voter's right to vote in the race is verified.

jerseyhoya wrote:A political politician, well I never

JUburton wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:A political politician, well I never

I mean even if you like Rubio, you have to cringe at going from seemingly not caring much for being a senator, to running for president (and clearly stating he will not run for senate), to lambasting trump, to getting destroyed and saying hey i guess i'll just run for senate again, to saying we must elect donald trump. POTUS said it best...he's willing to be anyone just to be someone.

jerseyhoya wrote:

JUburton wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:A political politician, well I never

I mean even if you like Rubio, you have to cringe at going from seemingly not caring much for being a senator, to running for president (and clearly stating he will not run for senate), to lambasting trump, to getting destroyed and saying hey i guess i'll just run for senate again, to saying we must elect donald trump. POTUS said it best...he's willing to be anyone just to be someone.

The only bit in there he flip flopped on was running for re-election to the Senate, which is in the grand scheme of political flip flops a pretty trivial thing, and in doing so he might save the Senate for the party. Really nothing to cringe at there. Also he's infinitely more competent than his opponent.

CalvinBall wrote:Some good NH polls this morning for Clinton.

Ohio on the other hand seems like a lost cause. Thanks you #$!&@ rednecks.

pacino wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:Some good NH polls this morning for Clinton.

Ohio on the other hand seems like a lost cause. Thanks you #$!&@ rednecks.

go vote tomorrow

“My analysis is that Trump would not be permitted to win. Why do I say that? Because he has had every establishment off his side. Trump does not have one establishment, maybe with the exception of the Evangelicals, if you can call them an establishment. Banks, intelligence, arms companies, foreign money, etc. are all united behind Hillary Clinton. And the media as well. Media owners, and the journalists themselves.”

jerseyhoya wrote: Also he's infinitely more competent than his opponent.

JUburton wrote:anyone check in on scott adams lately? he ok?