TenuredVulture wrote:You'd have to think at some point the Republicans will pay a price at the polls for all this. It certainly happened in the 90s--the impeachment of Bill Clinton cost the Republicans.

jamiethekiller wrote:from many 'adults' i've talked to:

"i think she's crooked."

they can't get past that. i push back on what she's crooked about and i get things like "these wikileaks emails." push back on them and ask whats so bad in them. Then follow up if she's anymore crooked than your standard politician do you think she'd be where she is? we see politicians fall from grace so fast in our system because they do dumb shit and get caught. she's been a target for 30 years and she's still out there doing her thing. you tell me how crooked she can possibly be.


one thing that is working. younger generation guilting parents. seen it first hand a few places where families are threatening fathers of never talking to them again and having their opinions change on them. thats a heavy burden for someone to carry. when your kids/wife say "i thought you were better than this" or "i'll never be able to look at you the same way again."

pacino wrote:There was no crime. They all had clearance. There's no need for a pardon. You do not lower yourself to the crazies by doing unnecessary things.

Doll Is Mine wrote:I turned on MSNBC this morning and they were talking about Trump possibly winning PA. Please stop.

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:at this point I'm hoping the doom and gloom doesn't suppress but rather brings people out

mozartpc27 wrote:

TenuredVulture wrote:You'd have to think at some point the Republicans will pay a price at the polls for all this. It certainly happened in the 90s--the impeachment of Bill Clinton cost the Republicans.

Yes - I'm sure we all remember with fondness President Gore's resounding victory in 2000, and his supermajority in Congress.

Doll Is Mine wrote:

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:at this point I'm hoping the doom and gloom doesn't suppress but rather brings people out

It's getting ridiculous now.

After PA, they moved on to Michigan. "But why is Hillary going to Detroit just a few days before the election?"

Officials from two European countries tell Newsweek that Trump’s comments about Russia’s hacking have alarmed several NATO partners because it suggests he either does not believe the information he receives in intelligence briefings, does not pay attention to it, does not understand it or is misleading the American public for unknown reasons. One British official says members of that government who are aware of the scope of Russia’s cyberattacks both in Western Europe and America found Trump’s comments “quite disturbing” because they fear that, if elected, the Republican presidential nominee would continue to ignore information gathered by intelligence services in the formulation of U.S. foreign policy.

Trump’s behavior, however, has at times concerned the Russians, leading them to revise their hacking and disinformation strategy. For example, when Trump launched into an inexplicable attack on the parents of a Muslim-American soldier who died in combat, the Kremlin assumed the Republican nominee was showing himself psychologically unfit to be president and would be forced by his party to withdraw from the race. As a result, Moscow put its hacking campaign temporarily on hold, ending the distribution of documents until Trump stabilized, both personally and in the polls, according to reports provided to Western intelligence.

pacino wrote:

mozartpc27 wrote:

TenuredVulture wrote:You'd have to think at some point the Republicans will pay a price at the polls for all this. It certainly happened in the 90s--the impeachment of Bill Clinton cost the Republicans.

Yes - I'm sure we all remember with fondness President Gore's resounding victory in 2000, and his supermajority in Congress.

President Gore's climate change focus has really saved our world.so glad we didn't spend all that money in a dumb way, like voluntarily getting into an unwinnable war. Good thing all those Nader fans decided for the good of the country to vote Gore.

Youseff wrote:

pacino wrote:

mozartpc27 wrote:

TenuredVulture wrote:You'd have to think at some point the Republicans will pay a price at the polls for all this. It certainly happened in the 90s--the impeachment of Bill Clinton cost the Republicans.

Yes - I'm sure we all remember with fondness President Gore's resounding victory in 2000, and his supermajority in Congress.

President Gore's climate change focus has really saved our world.so glad we didn't spend all that money in a dumb way, like voluntarily getting into an unwinnable war. Good thing all those Nader fans decided for the good of the country to vote Gore.

can you imagine? wouldn't be a perfect world but at least we wouldn't have spent trillions of dollars in Iraq. should really be something Americans talk about every day - how much of a disaster W was, how that's what happens when you give the GOP control. yet your average American, who may have voted for them to take power, don't see a connection between wanting lower taxes and paying for the world's most expensive war ever.

jamiethekiller wrote:pacman giving climate change a daily pause. in-between brushing and rinsing.