Slowhand wrote:Good news. Now never do that #$!&@ again.
AMEN...I did learn my lesson for sure.
Slowhand wrote:Good news. Now never do that #$!&@ again.
WilliamC wrote:Finally had my prelim hearing today for my dumbass .33 DUI. It apparently did help a lot that I did have no prior driving violations in my life. They did mention that my two underages that I had at 17 and 19 were still on my record and I could have requested to have had them expunged when I turned 21.
But basically the cop laid out $300 dollar fine, 6 months probation and a general impairment violation vs Highest level DUI, no loss of license to my lawyer and I just accepted. I think that was more than generous probably. Glad it's getting over and done with.
The Dude wrote:I loveJames Van Praagh's pic for his show at the Keswick
CalvinBall wrote:smitty wrote:Great weather today. Thanks SK, RIP.
Out on the back deck listening to Little Feat.
Messaged him on fb. Didn't hear back. Hope he's alright.
PrattRules wrote:WilliamC wrote:Finally had my prelim hearing today for my dumbass .33 DUI. It apparently did help a lot that I did have no prior driving violations in my life. They did mention that my two underages that I had at 17 and 19 were still on my record and I could have requested to have had them expunged when I turned 21.
But basically the cop laid out $300 dollar fine, 6 months probation and a general impairment violation vs Highest level DUI, no loss of license to my lawyer and I just accepted. I think that was more than generous probably. Glad it's getting over and done with.
Good stuff.
holy hell. how much did your lawyer cost?WilliamC wrote:Finally had my prelim hearing today for my dumbass .33 DUI. It apparently did help a lot that I did have no prior driving violations in my life. They did mention that my two underages that I had at 17 and 19 were still on my record and I could have requested to have had them expunged when I turned 21.
But basically the cop laid out $300 dollar fine, 6 months probation and a general impairment violation vs Highest level DUI, no loss of license to my lawyer and I just accepted. I think that was more than generous probably. Glad it's getting over and done with.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
CalvinBall wrote:i am being serious!
seems like any male, no matter the intent, can engage a female in any form of discourse or debate because it would be considered mansplaining.
Yeah it's generally a condescending explanation to topics that are more 'masculine' like sports, business, etc.Soren wrote:CalvinBall wrote:i am being serious!
seems like any male, no matter the intent, can engage a female in any form of discourse or debate because it would be considered mansplaining.
It's the approach to discourse/debate. I think what women experience is that rather than open a discussion, men barge in to correct them, and then explain the topic like the issue is the woman not understanding the subject matter.
JUburton wrote:Yeah it's generally a condescending explanation to topics that are more 'masculine' like sports, business, etc.Soren wrote:CalvinBall wrote:i am being serious!
seems like any male, no matter the intent, can engage a female in any form of discourse or debate because it would be considered mansplaining.
It's the approach to discourse/debate. I think what women experience is that rather than open a discussion, men barge in to correct them, and then explain the topic like the issue is the woman not understanding the subject matter.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.