Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Doll Is Mine » Sat Aug 06, 2016 01:57:39

Louise Mensch @LouiseMensch
Trump campaign won't let ordinary folks cancel a recurring donation - only way out is to cancel their credit cards


WTF?

Doll Is Mine
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 27502
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 20:40:30

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby SK790 » Sat Aug 06, 2016 06:05:51

why cancel donations? we're the best presidential campaign! why would you want to cancel a donation? maybe you love ISIS? i dunno! i love america. we want to build a wall. and we're going to make america great again!
I like teh waether

SK790
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 33040
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 23:12:01
Location: time is money; money is power; power is pizza; pizza is knowledge

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby drsmooth » Sat Aug 06, 2016 07:10:31

Doll Is Mine wrote:
Louise Mensch @LouiseMensch
Trump campaign won't let ordinary folks cancel a recurring donation - only way out is to cancel their credit cards


WTF?



drumpf is beautiful like a running sore, limpid with pus
Yes, but in a double utley you can put your utley on top they other guy's utley, and you're the winner. (Swish)

drsmooth
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 47349
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:24:48
Location: Low station

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Monkeyboy » Sat Aug 06, 2016 07:28:59

So does this end with an espionage indictment?

I'm starting to have a hard time thinking this is all just a coincidence. Something pretty major is going on.

Maybe Russia has something from Clinton's emails that will really hurt her?
Agnostic dyslexic insomniacs lay awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

Monkeyboy
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28452
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 21:01:51
Location: Beijing

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby CalvinBall » Sat Aug 06, 2016 09:28:02

Huh?

CalvinBall
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 64951
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 15:30:02
Location: Pigslyvania

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Monkeyboy » Sat Aug 06, 2016 10:46:01

I'm talking about the putin/trump thing. I'm not so sure he's unwitting anymore. It wouldn't be espionage though.
Agnostic dyslexic insomniacs lay awake all night wondering if there is a Dog.

Monkeyboy
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28452
Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 21:01:51
Location: Beijing

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby JFLNYC » Sat Aug 06, 2016 10:47:02

If Trump were a Dem there'd be at least 9 Congressional investigations into all this.
Jamie

"A man who tells lies . . . merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."

JFLNYC
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 34322
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 13:16:48
Location: Location, Location!

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby smitty » Sat Aug 06, 2016 13:11:21

SK790 wrote:why cancel donations? we're the best presidential campaign! why would you want to cancel a donation? maybe you love ISIS? i dunno! i love america. we want to build a wall. and we're going to make america great again!


Somebody told me this was all true.
Teams lie, sometimes for good reasons, sometimes for bad. They do it to get an advantage while they look at the trade market or just because they can

--Will Carroll

smitty
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 45450
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:00:27
Location: Federal Way, WA --Spursville

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby pacino » Sat Aug 06, 2016 22:12:14

A lot of conservatives in the Kansas legislature lost their primaries to more moderate Republicans who actually want to fund education and such.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby jerseyhoya » Sun Aug 07, 2016 01:35:05

Washington Post/ABC comes in at Clinton +8. The good national polls (NBC/WSJ +9, Fox +10, CNN/ORC +9) are all pretty much in agreement.

Kinda got a theory right now that this is the absolute worst result* for the party (in 2016). If it gets worse, it's because he's done something else awful and people unendorse and our downballot people can run their own damn races and win while he loses by 15%. If it gets a bit better I think we probably hold the Senate or just lose it 50-50 with Toomey and Ayotte unable to hold on. If it is actually close think not only do they both hold on but we pick up NV and maybe even hold Wisconsin so it's a wash just losing IL. But if it stays like this lose IL, WI, prob PA and NH, very maybe likely OH, FL, MO, NC, and then who knows what else gets competitive (IA? AZ?). Continue to think the worst case scenario for the party is him actually winning and nothing can move me off that, but I do think I want him to stop fucking up so some good people get re-elected. Either that or totally implode so some good people can disavow (in Trump parlance) without blowback.

That might be dumb cause ticket splitting is hardwork and whatnot, and him imploding might actually be worse. I dunno.

*other than him winning

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Doll Is Mine » Sun Aug 07, 2016 02:41:15

Those are some ugly numbers for Trump in that ABC/WP poll. 60% of those polled think Trump is biased against women and minorities. That's not good.

Doll Is Mine
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 27502
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 20:40:30

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby SK790 » Sun Aug 07, 2016 05:50:08

it's amazing it's only 60%
I like teh waether

SK790
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 33040
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 23:12:01
Location: time is money; money is power; power is pizza; pizza is knowledge

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Bucky » Sun Aug 07, 2016 07:31:08

jerseyhoya wrote:Washington Post/ABC comes in at Clinton +8. The good national polls (NBC/WSJ +9, Fox +10, CNN/ORC +9) are all pretty much in agreement.

Kinda got a theory right now that this is the absolute worst result* for the party (in 2016). If it gets worse, it's because he's done something else awful and people unendorse and our downballot people can run their own damn races and win while he loses by 15%. If it gets a bit better I think we probably hold the Senate or just lose it 50-50 with Toomey and Ayotte unable to hold on. If it is actually close think not only do they both hold on but we pick up NV and maybe even hold Wisconsin so it's a wash just losing IL. But if it stays like this lose IL, WI, prob PA and NH, very maybe likely OH, FL, MO, NC, and then who knows what else gets competitive (IA? AZ?). Continue to think the worst case scenario for the party is him actually winning and nothing can move me off that, but I do think I want him to stop #$!&@ up so some good people get re-elected. Either that or totally implode so some good people can disavow (in Trump parlance) without blowback.

That might be dumb cause ticket splitting is hardwork and whatnot, and him imploding might actually be worse. I dunno.

*other than him winning



from your lips to the New York Times' typewriters.

“Do we run the risk of depressing our base by repudiating the guy, or do we run the risk of being tarred and feathered by independents for not repudiating him? We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t.”

Bucky
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 58018
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:24:05
Location: You_Still_Have_To_Visit_Us

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby RichmondPhilsFan » Sun Aug 07, 2016 09:23:27

Doll Is Mine wrote:
Louise Mensch @LouiseMensch
Trump campaign won't let ordinary folks cancel a recurring donation - only way out is to cancel their credit cards


WTF?

If true (I'm skeptical), that is illegal.

RichmondPhilsFan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9738
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:49:07
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Bucky » Sun Aug 07, 2016 09:28:32

HAHAHAHAHHA LIKE THAT WOULD MATTER TO THIS CAMPAIGN

Bucky
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 58018
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:24:05
Location: You_Still_Have_To_Visit_Us

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Bucky » Sun Aug 07, 2016 09:30:22

and apparently, if not "true", they make it extremely difficult to cancel. No 'unsubscribe' link, and many who have called to try to cancel have as yet been unsuccessful. No reports yet of any who have successfully cancelled, but they wouldn't be complaining anyway.

Bucky
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 58018
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:24:05
Location: You_Still_Have_To_Visit_Us

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby The Crimson Cyclone » Sun Aug 07, 2016 09:38:38

FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.

The Crimson Cyclone
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9372
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 07:48:14

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby Bucky » Sun Aug 07, 2016 09:45:40

well, if you had registered account and followed the hidden path, it could be done. But if you didn't, you're outta luck.

SAD!

https://mic.com/articles/150640/donald- ... .IuuHi8uDy

Bucky
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 58018
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:24:05
Location: You_Still_Have_To_Visit_Us

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby The Nightman Cometh » Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:03:13

jerseyhoya wrote:Washington Post/ABC comes in at Clinton +8. The good national polls (NBC/WSJ +9, Fox +10, CNN/ORC +9) are all pretty much in agreement.

Kinda got a theory right now that this is the absolute worst result* for the party (in 2016). If it gets worse, it's because he's done something else awful and people unendorse and our downballot people can run their own damn races and win while he loses by 15%. If it gets a bit better I think we probably hold the Senate or just lose it 50-50 with Toomey and Ayotte unable to hold on. If it is actually close think not only do they both hold on but we pick up NV and maybe even hold Wisconsin so it's a wash just losing IL. But if it stays like this lose IL, WI, prob PA and NH, very maybe likely OH, FL, MO, NC, and then who knows what else gets competitive (IA? AZ?). Continue to think the worst case scenario for the party is him actually winning and nothing can move me off that, but I do think I want him to stop fucking up so some good people get re-elected. Either that or totally implode so some good people can disavow (in Trump parlance) without blowback.

That might be dumb cause ticket splitting is hardwork and whatnot, and him imploding might actually be worse. I dunno.

*other than him winning

I'd let you keep the Senate if you promised me Rubio's head. Taking the Senate and Rubio's seat seems too greedy to ask for.
The Nightman Cometh
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 8553
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 14:35:45

Re: Trump Dreck II: The Wrath of the Khans (politics)

Unread postby jerseyhoya » Sun Aug 07, 2016 13:09:33

It seems almost impossible for Rubio to lose without IL and WI falling. Hard for me to imagine an environment where he loses and Toomey and Ayotte don't. If Rubio loses, the Senate will also be gone.

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

PreviousNext