Bill McNeal wrote:I just don't like Hillary. At all, I don't think she would be a good president, she reminds me of John McCain in 2008, desperate.
I really like Bernie, and that's who I want as president honestly, I think this country could use a socialist turn. As for Romney, I don't agree with all of his views, but I think he's honest. I'd rather have a person who I think is honest in the white house than someone who will say whatever they have to say to get elected then adjust course. As for Kasich, I don't know anything about him, my comment on him was just that I want to understand his platform. I liked the way he handled himself in the last republican debate, but I don't know what he stands for. So I wanna know.
Kasich has a long, established career of being a pretty orthodox if not radical conservative. His "I'm a centrist" bit is a classic political ploy.
Romney is what he is - a fiscal conservative who will make a show of being conservative on social issues, and, if pushed to do so by the political situation, probably would be fairly conservative on the social stuff (i.e., if he is egged on by a Republican House and Senate).
If your preferred candidate, all other things being equal, is Bernie Sanders, then don't let personal feelings about Hillary get in the way. I could take her or leave her as an individual, I have misgivings about the dynastic nature of her candidacy - but she or Bernie or Barack are not the point: it's the issues that matter, and Hillary was almost as reliable a left-of-center voter in her time in the senate as Bernie was. If you like Bernie because of what he says he'll do, then you *should* vote Clinton if it comes down to it - because anybody from the right side of the aisle is going to largely continue the very Republican economic and social theories that Sanders' campaign is expressly against.