thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:Trump up 34 in Mass and 18 in Michigan according to two new polls today. Rubio sits at 16 and 12 percent in those respectively.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
TenuredVulture wrote: Let's be clear though--this outrage is not really being driven by poor people, it's being driven by people who are relatively well off and are angry anyway.
drsmooth wrote:TenuredVulture wrote: Let's be clear though--this outrage is not really being driven by poor people, it's being driven by people who are relatively well off and are angry anyway.
I'm not clear. Please elaborate
Bucky wrote:drsmooth wrote:Monkeyboy wrote:
I've been guessing Rubio but now I think it will be Trump with Rubio as VP (with Christie as a darkhorse attack dog VP choice)
You're welcome to think that, but that's never happening, for too many reasons to list. "It doesn't make any sense" is the main one. Help me - spell out why you think it makes any sense.
look at what/who (the subjects, not the guesser) we're talking about here. Why would it have to make sense
drsmooth wrote:Turnip focusing on the issues, namely "is Rubio eligible for the Presidency?".
If I'm one of the R candidates I ask for Turnip's certified birth certificate. I'm pretty sure he's an alien. I mean a real alien. A space alien. From Uranus
TenuredVulture wrote: I bet Hillary wins Flint by a large margin.
TenuredVulture wrote:drsmooth wrote:TenuredVulture wrote: Let's be clear though--this outrage is not really being driven by poor people, it's being driven by people who are relatively well off and are angry anyway.
I'm not clear. Please elaborate
Poor people aren't supporting Trump or Sanders. I bet Hillary wins Flint by a large margin.
SK790 wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:drsmooth wrote:TenuredVulture wrote: Let's be clear though--this outrage is not really being driven by poor people, it's being driven by people who are relatively well off and are angry anyway.
I'm not clear. Please elaborate
Poor people aren't supporting Trump or Sanders. I bet Hillary wins Flint by a large margin.
The outrage seems to be coming from people wishing for some fictional "good old days" where they could openly say racist, homophobic, etc... things. Trump really does seem to speak to the latently racist white Northeasterner.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
SK790 wrote:in contrast, i have not met a single trump supporter out here or even seen a single trump sign/sticker/anything. i know i live in deep blue seattle, but he's really hated here. one food truck i work with tied a trump doll that was beaten to hell to their bumper and they told me they saw an increase in business because of it. this is all very anecdotal, but if Peggy Noonan can get paid for this shit, i can post it on backshegoes.com.
the poll numbers agree, trump is very unpopular in the west.