TenuredVulture wrote:Is there an Eatdatpussy take on the election? Seems pretty socially conservative, given that he doesn't actually, you know, eat sissy.
The equivalent of it is right above your post.
TenuredVulture wrote:Is there an Eatdatpussy take on the election? Seems pretty socially conservative, given that he doesn't actually, you know, eat sissy.
Wheels Tupay wrote:Johnson got over 1.1 million votes. Proud of him.
1. PPP (D)
1. Daily Kos/SEIU/PPP
3. YouGov
4. Ipsos/Reuters
5. Purple Strategies
6. NBC/WSJ
6. CBS/NYT
6. YouGov/Economist
9. UPI/CVOTER
10. IBD/TIPP
11. Angus-Reid
12. ABC/WP
13. Pew Research
13. Hartford Courant/UConn
15. CNN/ORC
15. Monmouth/SurveyUSA
15. Politico/GWU/Battleground
15. FOX News
15. Washington Times/JZ Analytics
15. Newsmax/JZ Analytics
15. American Research Group
15. Gravis Marketing
23. Democracy Corps (D)
24. Rasmussen
24. Gallup
26. NPR
27. National Journal
28. AP/GfK
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
“Because it’s a changing country,” O’Reilly insisted. “The demographics are changing. It’s not a traditional America anymore and there are 50 percent of the voting public who want stuff, they want things. And who is going to give them things? President Obama.”
“The white establishment is now the minority,” he added. “And the voters — many of them — feel that this economic system is stacked against them and they want stuff. You’re going to see a tremendous Hispanic vote for President Obama, overwhelming black vote for President Obama and women will probably break President Obama’s way.”
“People feel that they are entitled to things. And which candidate between the two is going to give them things?”
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:“Because it’s a changing country,” O’Reilly insisted. “The demographics are changing. It’s not a traditional America anymore and there are 50 percent of the voting public who want stuff, they want things. And who is going to give them things? President Obama.”
“The white establishment is now the minority,” he added. “And the voters — many of them — feel that this economic system is stacked against them and they want stuff. You’re going to see a tremendous Hispanic vote for President Obama, overwhelming black vote for President Obama and women will probably break President Obama’s way.”
“People feel that they are entitled to things. And which candidate between the two is going to give them things?”
bleh wrote:pacino wrote:“Because it’s a changing country,” O’Reilly insisted. “The demographics are changing. It’s not a traditional America anymore and there are 50 percent of the voting public who want stuff, they want things. And who is going to give them things? President Obama.”
“The white establishment is now the minority,” he added. “And the voters — many of them — feel that this economic system is stacked against them and they want stuff. You’re going to see a tremendous Hispanic vote for President Obama, overwhelming black vote for President Obama and women will probably break President Obama’s way.”
“People feel that they are entitled to things. And which candidate between the two is going to give them things?”
Obama also got 73% of the Asian vote. I guess they are all looking for handouts too.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Trent Steele wrote:Can I get some Asian pals to explain to me the Obama love? This interests me.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
Trent Steele wrote:Can I get some Asian pals to explain to me the Obama love? This interests me.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Trent Steele wrote:Can I get some Asian pals to explain to me the Obama love? This interests me.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:Trent Steele wrote:Can I get some Asian pals to explain to me the Obama love? This interests me.
immigration is a big reason, also the tendency for asians to live in urban areas, where democrats are strongest. this leads politically minded people to start out in that party, and then stick with it.
CalvinBall wrote:loving the reaction. the electorate is now changed. obama didnt even get crushed in the male vote. cleaned up with women. seriously really looking forward to what will happen with all this, hopeful for compromise. when karl rove gets shell shocked you know you won big.
Warszawa wrote:CalvinBall wrote:loving the reaction. the electorate is now changed. obama didnt even get crushed in the male vote. cleaned up with women. seriously really looking forward to what will happen with all this, hopeful for compromise. when karl rove gets shell shocked you know you won big.
but really..... whats wrong with white men? i'm kinda embarrassed to be one right now
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
TenuredVulture wrote:pacino wrote:Trent Steele wrote:Can I get some Asian pals to explain to me the Obama love? This interests me.
immigration is a big reason, also the tendency for asians to live in urban areas, where democrats are strongest. this leads politically minded people to start out in that party, and then stick with it.
Not a lot of Asian fundies either.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.