td11 wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:Only Barack Obama is allowed to mislead people about his opponent's stance on auto industry issues! How appalling by Romney! Didn't he know that?!

chrysler itself is reaming romney, it's misleading to call it just "misleading." it's an outright, blatant and 100% lie

td11 wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:Only Barack Obama is allowed to mislead people about his opponent's stance on auto industry issues! How appalling by Romney! Didn't he know that?!

chrysler itself is reaming romney, it's misleading to call it just "misleading." it's an outright, blatant and 100% lie

[President Obama] sold Chrysler to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China. Mitt Romney will fight for every American job.

"Barack Obama says he saved the auto industry. But for who? Ohio or China? Under President Obama, GM cut 15,000 American jobs, but they are planning to double the number of cars built in China which means 15,000 more jobs for China. And now comes word that Chrysler is starting to build cars in, you guessed it, China. What happened to the promises made to autoworkers in Toledo and throughout Ohio? The same hard-working men and women who were told that Obama’s auto bailout would help them. Mitt Romney grew up in the Auto Industry. Maybe that’s why the Detroit News endorsed him saying ‘Romney understands the industry and will shield it from regulators who never tire of churning out new layers of mandates. Mitt Romney – he’ll stand up for the auto industry. In Ohio, not China."

td11 wrote:again, pres suspended his campaign and all donation efforts have been going to red cross since monday.

td11 wrote:jeep is not moving production of cars to china for the US market. cars for the US market will still be built here. did you read the letter that chrysler's own GM wrote? the ad's implication is clearly that chrysler is moving all production to china, if you don't see that i really don't know what to say. not only that but the romney campaign just put a new ad out

"Barack Obama says he saved the auto industry. But for who? Ohio or China? Under President Obama, GM cut 15,000 American jobs, but they are planning to double the number of cars built in China which means 15,000 more jobs for China. And now comes word that Chrysler is starting to build cars in, you guessed it, China. What happened to the promises made to autoworkers in Toledo and throughout Ohio? The same hard-working men and women who were told that Obama’s auto bailout would help them. Mitt Romney grew up in the Auto Industry. Maybe that’s why the Detroit News endorsed him saying ‘Romney understands the industry and will shield it from regulators who never tire of churning out new layers of mandates. Mitt Romney – he’ll stand up for the auto industry. In Ohio, not China."

ohio is not losing any jobs over this and to suggest so, which the ad clearly does imo, is a blatant lie

pacino wrote:chrysler is expanding its reach in china. they want chinese cars built in china for chinese people. why even mention it,if not to erroneously imply that somehow these are jobs that americans are losing????

pacino wrote:chrysler is expanding its reach in china. they want chinese cars built in china for chinese people. why even mention it,if not to erroneously imply that somehow these are jobs that americans are losing????

CalvinBall wrote:Worthless knock it off

Werthless wrote:

td11 wrote:jeep is not moving production of cars to china for the US market. cars for the US market will still be built here. did you read the letter that chrysler's own GM wrote? the ad's implication is clearly that chrysler is moving all production to china, if you don't see that i really don't know what to say. not only that but the romney campaign just put a new ad out

"Barack Obama says he saved the auto industry. But for who? Ohio or China? Under President Obama, GM cut 15,000 American jobs, but they are planning to double the number of cars built in China which means 15,000 more jobs for China. And now comes word that Chrysler is starting to build cars in, you guessed it, China. What happened to the promises made to autoworkers in Toledo and throughout Ohio? The same hard-working men and women who were told that Obama’s auto bailout would help them. Mitt Romney grew up in the Auto Industry. Maybe that’s why the Detroit News endorsed him saying ‘Romney understands the industry and will shield it from regulators who never tire of churning out new layers of mandates. Mitt Romney – he’ll stand up for the auto industry. In Ohio, not China."

ohio is not losing any jobs over this and to suggest so, which the ad clearly does imo, is a blatant lie

Please highlight the lie, in bold. I can't see the 100% outright, boldfaced lie that you're alluding to.

dajafi wrote:There's nothing more sophisticated and worldly than calling everyone a liar and then patting yourself on the back for seeing the cleverness of your side's lies.

Today, we got a look at Romney’s charity in action, when he held an event that he swears was not a campaign rally in Ohio aimed at “storm relief” (the choice of a song with the lyrics “Knee deep in the water somewhere” was perhaps ill advised). The Romney campaign encouraged attendees to bring canned goods, clothes, and other items to be sent to Hurricane victims. “We have a lot of goods here…that these people will need,” Romney said in his brief remarks. “We’re going to box them up, then send them into to New Jersey.”

This undoubtedly comes from a good place and with good intentions, but is hardly a substitute for the relief efforts — in fact, it may actually hinder them. The Red Cross, for which Romney is soliciting donations, doesn’t even accept goods. “Unfortunately, due to logistical constraints the Red Cross does not accept or solicit individual donations or collections of items. Items such as collected food, used clothing and shoes must be sorted, cleaned, repackaged and transported which impedes the valuable resources of money, time, and personnel,” the NGO’s website explains. With financial donations, they can buy exactly what is needed closer to the site, and it helps stimulate the local economy in the process.

pacino wrote:mitt romney's budget proposal would cut FEMA to 1.8 billion from 13 billion.