Rochée Jeffrey ‏@ithas2besaid
If Obama was this overbearing and vociferous, he would be just another aggressive black man. No one would let him do what Romney is doing.

td11 wrote:

td11 wrote:

jeff2sf wrote:

The Nightman Cometh wrote:Jeff, what is your view of the debate and it's potential effect on the race?

I think Romney is clearly winning. Not killing him, but clearly winning. I think, but am not sure if it's more of a hope, that this will not be a big deal given the few undecideds.

fwiw i think andrew sullivan needs to untwist his panties, though

10.12 pm. Finally, Obama manages to point out the vagueness of Romney's hazy alternatives. But Romney, who just rolls ovr Lehrer. Yet another round to Romney. I don't think Obama has won a single exchange in this entire debate.

cmon now

I don't think there is much of a queston that Romney has been the much better presenter tonight.

But then W's first debate performance was close to disastrous. Who knows if any of this matters.

dajafi wrote:This really is 2004.

Hold your horses there Clint.

POOR KIDS, err ahh, dirty filthy 47%ers, OH SHIT, I MEAN, lower income children, rather

philliesphhan wrote:And his line about young people being allowed on their parents' coverage already is a clever lie. You can't stay on it past 22.

Really? My employer tells me 26.

philliesphhan wrote:Life + liberty = outrageous military spending?

liberty, noun

The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life unless you're gay

The Nightman Cometh wrote:

dajafi wrote:This really is 2004.

Hold your horses there Clint.

I don't get it.

Was referring to the stiff flip-flopper from Massachusetts having a much better first debate than the incumbent president. And hopefully still losing.

cshort wrote:

philliesphhan wrote:And his line about young people being allowed on their parents' coverage already is a clever lie. You can't stay on it past 22.

Really? My employer tells me 26.

I guess my parents' plan was different. I haven't been 22 for seven years though.

cshort wrote:

philliesphhan wrote:And his line about young people being allowed on their parents' coverage already is a clever lie. You can't stay on it past 22.

Really? My employer tells me 26.

Yeah, it's been that way for us before Obama care as well. It makes a lot of sense--parents are paying to keep their 22-26 year olds on insurance, an age group that probably consumes less healthcare than any other. I think over those 4 years, I went to the doctor maybe once because to have a boil lanced. Premiums are probably a lot more than health expenses for that group.

He said that coverage was already "in the marketplace." The problem was that it wasn't affordable.

I count at least three zingers, but I've also been drinking.

dajafi wrote:

The Nightman Cometh wrote:

dajafi wrote:This really is 2004.

Hold your horses there Clint.

I don't get it.

Was referring to the stiff flip-flopper from Massachusetts having a much better first debate than the incumbent president. And hopefully still losing.

Oh. I've been playing the drinking game. Carry on.

YEAH OBAMA FUCK GREEN ENERGY WHY DIDN'T U HIRE 2,000,000 TEACHERS INSTEAD? WTF BRO

Woody wrote:YEAH OBAMA FUCK GREEN ENERGY WHY DIDN'T U HIRE 2,000,000 TEACHERS INSTEAD? WTF BRO

And I'm all for green energy, just not spending any money on it

"Republicans and Democrats both love America."

Guess Romney doesn't talk to many Republicans about their talking points

Do you think Romney really cares about people who are hurting? Because this is the first time I've heard him say anything about that.

Jim Lehrer has no control at all. He's horrible.

Was that am Obama zinger?

Yeah, the green energy line was ripe for a pushback. He didn't hit it, as he hasn't hit many of the openings Mitt has given him.

TenuredVulture wrote:Do you think Romney really cares about people who are hurting? Because this is the first time I've heard him say anything about that.

He's rather famously on tape showing great disdain for them, isn't he?