swishnicholson wrote:Philly the Kid wrote:I don't care about any brand-name label. As long as you are not denying the pathology or that there is a real illness in play. BTW - the CDC does acknowledge CFIDS/ME and has a definition.
I shouldn't get into this but:
Yes, they define it, but they define it as something for which "The cause or causes ... have not been identified and no specific diagnostic tests are available.Moreover, since many illnesses have incapacitating fatigue as a symptom, care must be taken to exclude other known and often treatable conditions before a diagnosis of CFS is made." link
So, yes it has a name, but it's basically a long way of saying "of unknown origin" (as are the other syndromes mentioned above). And while I suppose it's of some comfort to have a name attached to one's malady, I can't think of anyone who wouldn't prefer to have a diagnosis of an actual, treatable disease with an established pathology and protocol for treatment. This isn't to minimize the suffering of those afflicted, which is certainly real, or to indicate they can get no relief, since some of the symptoms can be ameliorated. Unfortunately, this vagueness and lack of understanding about the syndrome does open up the field to unscrupulous or misguided people ready to offer "cures" to desperate people.
swish wrote: Unfortunately, this vagueness and lack of understanding about the syndrome does open up the field to unscrupulous or misguided people ready to offer "cures" to desperate people.
Bucky wrote:... It's just that they are "diagnoses of exclusion".
PrattRules wrote:Sweaters f'n rule.
jamiethekiller wrote:PrattRules wrote:Sweaters f'n rule.
you're one of them guys, huh?
Soren wrote:jamiethekiller wrote:PrattRules wrote:Sweaters f'n rule.
you're one of them guys, huh?
wtf is wrong with sweaters jezzis cripes can I enjoy just this one thing
WilliamC wrote:I just agreed to work Christmas day at X4 pay. I feel like I have sold my soul. I am also working new years eve at x3 pay. I've given my life away for money.