jeff2sf wrote:Smoothie, I'm not going to decide any vote for any politician by whether or not they support voter IDs. It's so far down the list of priorities for me it's laughable. But I was just weighing in on my opinion that it seems eminently reasonable to ask someone to show ID. It also seems eminently reasonable to fund whatever program we need to in order to make sure people can get the IDs they need, even if we have to go to them. EMINENTLY REASONABLE.
jeff2sf wrote:I do. Me and him don't have to agree on everything. His livelihood is staked to him making sure every last voter has no impediment to vote. A more cynical view might be that every last voter of his has no impediment to SEVERAL votes. Chicago machine FTW.
pacino wrote:No offense smooth, but i rarely decipher your posts. Could you possibly be clearer?
Bakestar wrote:What types of ID are these proposed initiatives requiring?
State seeks federal aid for Irene damage
In a letter to the White House today, Governor Corbett asserted that the magnitude of the damage is beyond the response capabilities of the state and affected local governments and requires supplementary federal assistance, said a news release from Corbett's office.
Warszawa wrote:Your party is currently supporting a philosophy of cutting other expenses to meet the spending needed for emergencies such as this past "hurricane".