jerseyhoya wrote:I'm having more fun than I should following the RNC election on twitter
the candidate slate suggests this is a tallest dwarf runoff
jerseyhoya wrote:I'm having more fun than I should following the RNC election on twitter
TenuredVulture wrote:Wiz, I was thinking about somehow getting into the distressed european debt market, perhaps hedging by shorting the euro (using etf) but Mohamed El-Arian on CNBC said there might be haircuts involved in European debt. So I care. Has anyone started using the phrase Eurojunk to describe this debt?
Barry Jive wrote:I care, Wiz. Even though most of my relatives over there are up north.
Wizlah wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Wiz, I was thinking about somehow getting into the distressed european debt market, perhaps hedging by shorting the euro (using etf) but Mohamed El-Arian on CNBC said there might be haircuts involved in European debt. So I care. Has anyone started using the phrase Eurojunk to describe this debt?
The day you start looking to a stay at home, father of two who freelances in his spare time as a sound source of economic analysis is the day your kid's hopes and dreams of third level education disappear in a puff of smoke.
But seriously, CNBC are only now getting round to mentioning haircuts? you read the economist, you should know this. Merkel and the IMF rattling sabres about this $#@! is what drove the interest rates on irish government bonds through the roof back in november and december. It is very old news.
You really shouldn't care about Ireland. Ireland's political escapades in the next 6-12 months will have little impact on the Euro. the economy is #$&!, there is no money, and although the black hole that is the irish banking sector shows no signs of yielding the secret of its limit to the world, or indeed to the shareholders. The IMF/European Central Bank (ECB) deal is in place, and it's up to Ireland to hit its targets from here on out to keep funneling the funds through to the banking sector. Sure, it's a drain on ECB coffers, and yes, the lack of talk of restructuring is foolish in the extreme, but it's a steady outflow, a known unknown, and I doubt that it's going to cause the euro major problems. Spain and Italy had solid bond sales today, so the pressure is off for now from the markets, although the ECB is threatening interest rate rises because, like everyone else, they're feeling cost push inflation threatening because the price of oil is back up.
Seriously, if you're dabbling in that, just go and read up on each country. It's not hard. The likes of El Pais, Der Spiegel, La Monde Diplomatiqe all have english language sites. Go check through the business sections. Go read the IMF quarterly reports, and trawl through the ECB website. There's a $#@! load of free information out there on which to base sensible decisions. And unlike me, your job affords you the time to do some solid research.
4:00 Steele left, Snagglepuss-style, after saying "exit, stage right." Then he went stage left.
Congress decided it wanted to prohibit [child labor], so it passed a law--no more child labor. The Supreme Court heard a challenge to that and the Supreme Court decided a case in 1918 called Hammer v. Dagenhardt. In that case, the Supreme Court acknowledged something very interesting -- that, as reprehensible as child labor is, and as much as it ought to be abandoned -- that's something that has to be done by state legislators, not by Members of Congress. [...]
This may sound harsh, but it was designed to be that way. It was designed to be a little bit harsh. Not because we like harshness for the sake of harshness, but because we like a clean division of power, so that everybody understands whose job it is to regulate what.
Now, we got rid of child labor, notwithstanding this case. So the entire world did not implode as a result of that ruling.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:Don't you hate little kids working in sweatshops? I know I do. It sucks. Good thing we banned it, and did it in one fell swoop at a federal level. Well, the new Senator from Utah Mike Lee disagrees and wishes it was all done in the perfect way that would've been 100% constitutionally approved (despite the supreme court, congress and executive all being happy with how it was done):Congress decided it wanted to prohibit [child labor], so it passed a law--no more child labor. The Supreme Court heard a challenge to that and the Supreme Court decided a case in 1918 called Hammer v. Dagenhardt. In that case, the Supreme Court acknowledged something very interesting -- that, as reprehensible as child labor is, and as much as it ought to be abandoned -- that's something that has to be done by state legislators, not by Members of Congress. [...]
This may sound harsh, but it was designed to be that way. It was designed to be a little bit harsh. Not because we like harshness for the sake of harshness, but because we like a clean division of power, so that everybody understands whose job it is to regulate what.
Now, we got rid of child labor, notwithstanding this case. So the entire world did not implode as a result of that ruling.
No wonder Bob Bennett was considered too liberal. His political theory wasn't up to snuff.
pacino wrote:Anyone been following what's happened in Tunisia? I mean I knew it was not a 'free' country and it was kind of being led by a despot...but I didn't know it was on edge so much. He resigned and fled the country and hte president of parliament has 2 months to have a new election.
the big deals were unemployment and oppression
wowzers
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jerseyhoya wrote:I'd suggest that headline writer find a new job
Arizona has become a national leader in the gun rights movement in recent years as the state enacted law after law to protect the people's right to bear arms nearly anywhere, at anytime.
The shooting rampage that wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, a former legislative colleague, has done nothing to slow down the Legislature.
Gun rights bills were introduced in the days after the shootings last week, and more proposals are to come.
"I don't think it really changes anything," Republican state Sen. Ron Gould said of the mass shooting. "I don't see how gun control could have prevented that shooting unless you take guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens."