SK790 wrote:My neck hurts. I hate when it happens.
Cunnalingus?
SK790 wrote:My neck hurts. I hate when it happens.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Slowhand wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:I might have some very good news for everyone.
Try me, professor.
Here you stand before the turning table, you are the zillionth person singular, playing the role of I.
“I’m live, let it be known”, you say to yourself, “I love you”
And a million second persons singular hear you speak and perhaps tomorrow, perhaps a zillion years from now, your voice is made of darkness
You do love I, but in so doing you break all the proper rules of English
And the you who loves you alone is wondering whether you are saying “you” singular or “you” plural.
And you think, “Do you really love you?”, and I laugh at the way your mind works
VoxOrion wrote:Here you stand before the turning table, you are the zillionth person singular, playing the role of I.
“I’m live, let it be known”, you say to yourself, “I love you”
And a million second persons singular hear you speak and perhaps tomorrow, perhaps a zillion years from now, your voice is made of darkness
You do love I, but in so doing you break all the proper rules of English
And the you who loves you alone is wondering whether you are saying “you” singular or “you” plural.
And you think, “Do you really love you?”, and I laugh at the way your mind works
jerseyhoya wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:I might have some very good news for everyone.
Did we get Halladay?
EndlessSummer wrote:I dealt with the Jason Voorhees of mice last night.
(warning: animal cruelty ahead).....
....This, I assure you, was not a wonderful way to spend a Friday night.
TenuredVulture wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:I might have some very good news for everyone.
Did we get Halladay?
I know nothing about that.
TenuredVulture wrote:Slowhand wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:I might have some very good news for everyone.
Try me, professor.
If it's true, everyone will know soon enough.
Randall Stross in NYTimes wrote:
Apple Wouldn’t Risk Its Cool Over a Gimmick, Would It?
...."In an application filed last year and made public last month by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Apple is seeking a patent for technology that displays advertising on almost anything that has a screen of some kind: computers, phones, televisions, media players, game devices and other consumer electronics.
Filing a patent application, of course, doesn’t necessarily mean that the company plans to use the technology. But the application shows, at the least, that Apple has invested in research to develop what it calls an “enforcement routine” that makes people watch ads they may not want to watch....
....Would anyone have guessed that Apple, so widely revered, would seek patent protection of a gimmick not unlike one used to sell vacation timeshares?....
....Everything about this technology seems so antithetical to the guiding principles of Apple that one would naturally wonder whether Steven P. Jobs even knows whether his company filed a patent application for such a thing.....