Slowhand wrote:I haven't read it all, but I'm getting the impression this random thoughts thread was more quantity than quality.
Lindsay: We had a guest speaker in class yesterday. She works at IBM.
I asked her about IBM offering the people they've laid off jobs in India.
Like basically they're said instead of outsourcing your job, you can outsource yourself. But you gotta live in India and get paid that wage.
It made her a little awkward.
Lindsay: I asked a few more questions about it until she admitted that she doesn't think she'll have a job next year and is gonna start looking for a job in May
me: spokesman fail
CrashburnAlley wrote:VoxOrion wrote:CrashburnAlley wrote:VoxOrion wrote:All you have to do is pick up an instrument you don't know how to play, try and play it, and you'll have the easiest example of objectivity in music. One can take the "Make a joyful noise" thing too far.
That is subjective, though. We are socialized to believe that certain arrangements of sounds are pleasing, while others (like random strumming by a guitar newbie) are not.
It's not subjective. You're taking relativism to a "socialized" degree that is nonsensical.
I'm not seeing it, though. I'm not intentionally trying to be obtuse, I'm just trying to understand it, and I'm having a hard time. :?
I guess it's not subjective if you take an appeal to majority to be objective.
You don't have to guide me along here if you don't want to, but I'm just genuinely curious in understanding this.
my cousin mose wrote:holy crap i really did say a bunch of stuff on here that i shouldn't have said.
my bad to all
WilliamC wrote:Does anyone remember the band toad the wet sprocket, they had a few good songs I remembered just now