holy quote warkakke

jerseyhoya wrote:

Philly the Kid wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:What's wrong with Clarence Thomas?

I need an emoticon for "speechless" ...

His qualifications. Yale Law, assistant AG in Missouri, Chairman of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

wasn't he sued because he called a girl int he EEOC a dyke, or some such?


and didn't he lie to congress about firing a gay worker in that position by claiming that the guy was a racist?

steagles wrote:and didn't he lie to congress about firing a gay worker in that position by claiming that the guy was a racist?

I've read, but have no concrete evidence, that the worker was both gay and racist. In fact, he was part of a cabal of skinheads, corporate trans-national robber barrons, and secret homoeroticists.

VoxOrion wrote:

Philly the Kid wrote:What do you want me to do Vox? I will never be able to prove anything to you and others satisfaction.

I think you reassure yourself too often that you "aren't a wacko" for my comfort. .

I am NOT an alcoholic.

Really though, I used to know a guy in school that would always say crazy shit and start it out by saying "I am not paranoid but...."

It turned out he we not only paranoid but a schizophrenic.

Woody wrote:holy quote warkakke

"Warkakke" is, perhaps, the single funniest word ever posted at BSG. Or the internets in general.

steagles wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Philly the Kid wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:What's wrong with Clarence Thomas?

I need an emoticon for "speechless" ...

His qualifications. Yale Law, assistant AG in Missouri, Chairman of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

wasn't he sued because he called a girl int he EEOC a dyke, or some such?

and didn't he lie to congress about firing a gay worker in that position by claiming that the guy was a racist?

I could be wrong, but I don't think this is what P-t-K is talking about when he said "please don't tell me that Clarence Thomas had qualifications to be a SC justice!"

steagles wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Philly the Kid wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:What's wrong with Clarence Thomas?

I need an emoticon for "speechless" ...

His qualifications. Yale Law, assistant AG in Missouri, Chairman of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

wasn't he sued because he called a girl int he EEOC a dyke, or some such?


and didn't he lie to congress about firing a gay worker in that position by claiming that the guy was a racist?

How many here actually saw and or followed the confirmation hearings and were exposed to any analyses not on CBS, CNN FOx etc...? I followed the entire hearings and listened to many experts discredit CT in every aspect, his moral fiber, his integrity, his committment to uphold the law, his intellectual prowess and legal expertise to have earned the right to sit on the highest court. He was a puppet put in to walk in lock-step with Reagan-Bush-Cheney-neo-con-far-rightwingers... to vote as they would have him vote. He's no scholar. Anita Hill was more credible than CT.

somewhere out there is a man with a giant butterfly net looking for you PTK

the neo cons are recruiting afro americans now?

Philly the Kid wrote:

steagles wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Philly the Kid wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:What's wrong with Clarence Thomas?

I need an emoticon for "speechless" ...

His qualifications. Yale Law, assistant AG in Missouri, Chairman of the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, DC Circuit Court of Appeals.

wasn't he sued because he called a girl int he EEOC a dyke, or some such?


and didn't he lie to congress about firing a gay worker in that position by claiming that the guy was a racist?

How many here actually saw and or followed the confirmation hearings and were exposed to any analyses not on CBS, CNN FOx etc...? I followed the entire hearings and listened to many experts discredit CT in every aspect, his moral fiber, his integrity, his committment to uphold the law, his intellectual prowess and legal expertise to have earned the right to sit on the highest court. He was a puppet put in to walk in lock-step with Reagan-Bush-Cheney-neo-con-far-rightwingers... to vote as they would have him vote. He's no scholar. Anita Hill was more credible than CT.

Uh, where/who were the experts you listened to?

Woody wrote:the neo cons are recruiting afro americans now?

White puppets are totally easy to spot. Stick an afro on one, and you're home (and homo) free.

Shore wrote:

Woody wrote:the neo cons are recruiting afro americans now?

White puppets are totally easy to spot. Stick an afro on one, and you're home (and homo) free.

sweet jesus

I don't have time. But as requested, I put a quick search on Google and found this within seconds... it at least starts to point at the many kinds of things that may have been going on. There are connections between seeming disconneceted things.

And I'm by no means some fringe paranoid in my views, there are millions who share similar views. We're not all making it up or believing fairy tales.

just to get started

Is that site unbiased, would you say?

Shore wrote:Uh, where/who were the experts you listened to?

The details of his life are quite inconsequential... very well, where do I begin? Clarance Thomas' father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. His mother was a fifteen year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. His father would womanize, he would drink. He would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Sometimes he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy. The sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. Clarence's childhood was typical. Summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring they'd make meat helmets. When he was insolent he was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds- pretty standard really. At the age of twelve he received his first scribe. At the age of fourteen a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved his testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum... it's breathtaking- I highly suggest you try it.

FTN wrote:Is that site unbiased, would you say?

Is Fox unbiased? I consider Fox worthless and nothing but a propoganda tool. I don't know anything about the site, who made it, who's behind it, what other agenda they might have. But i saw in the headings on the one page, a variety of issues that were in play. Idon't know if the links go to credible data or not. They might.... it was just a starting point for some framework....

This thread has all the moral weight of a 12 year-old sociopath who tortures animals out back the old homestead.

Philly the Kid wrote:

FTN wrote:Is that site unbiased, would you say?

Is Fox unbiased? I consider Fox worthless and nothing but a propoganda tool. I don't know anything about the site, who made it, who's behind it, what other agenda they might have. But i saw in the headings on the one page, a variety of issues that were in play. Idon't know if the links go to credible data or not. They might.... it was just a starting point for some framework....

Are you serious?

You gave a website you didn't check out, and you think its some kind of starting point? If I say "cigarettes don't cause cancer", and when pressed for facts, give a website run by Phillip Morris, would you say that is credible, and a good place to start?

Philly the Kid wrote:

FTN wrote:Is that site unbiased, would you say?

Is Fox unbiased? I consider Fox worthless and nothing but a propoganda tool. I don't know anything about the site, who made it, who's behind it, what other agenda they might have. But i saw in the headings on the one page, a variety of issues that were in play. Idon't know if the links go to credible data or not. They might.... it was just a starting point for some framework....

THEN FIND A SITE THAT YOU KNOW TO BE CREDIBLE SO PEOPLE AREN'T WASTING TIME OR DOING THEIR WORK FOR YOU