traderdave wrote:"Tellem might try to direct Embiid to a certain franchise and not have him go through a physical or interview for any team but the team he wants Embiid to play for next season"
Probably unjustified but this kind of shit drives me up a wall. It is not good enough that this fucking guy is going to make tens of millions putting a ball into a hoop but he has to pick the team he will play for too? Gimme a break. If I am a GM and this guy will not consent to a physical and/or an interview I figure he has got something to hide and I tell him to go fuck himself. If this stuff is true, I hope he drops into the second round**.
**I know he will not drop into the second round.
JFLNYC wrote:Pretty damn uppity of these guys trying to dictate where they'll live.
WilliamC wrote:She looked really hot. A private "wtf" moment because I can't say out loud in public "BigEd was full of shit"
JFLNYC wrote:I understand the ostensible rationale for sports drafts, but the fact of the matter is they're combinations in restraint of trade more designed to hold down salaries than to foster competition and we wink at their illegality in the name of sport.
lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:I understand the ostensible rationale for sports drafts, but the fact of the matter is they're combinations in restraint of trade more designed to hold down salaries than to foster competition and we wink at their illegality in the name of sport.
They're not illegal if they're collectively bargained with the union. The other parts of your statement are true, but you know the motivation of the NBA union guys, it looks like they want to suppress top end salaries and entry level salaries and help the middle class salaries. They don't care much about the fringe guys.
BigEd76 wrote:WilliamC wrote:She looked really hot. A private "wtf" moment because I can't say out loud in public "BigEd was full of #$!&@"
Wait, are we talking about Indian girl or Bucks girl?
JFLNYC wrote:lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:I understand the ostensible rationale for sports drafts, but the fact of the matter is they're combinations in restraint of trade more designed to hold down salaries than to foster competition and we wink at their illegality in the name of sport.
They're not illegal if they're collectively bargained with the union. The other parts of your statement are true, but you know the motivation of the NBA union guys, it looks like they want to suppress top end salaries and entry level salaries and help the middle class salaries. They don't care much about the fringe guys.
You're forgetting that the human beings being drafted are not members of the union.
JFLNYC wrote:lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:I understand the ostensible rationale for sports drafts, but the fact of the matter is they're combinations in restraint of trade more designed to hold down salaries than to foster competition and we wink at their illegality in the name of sport.
They're not illegal if they're collectively bargained with the union. The other parts of your statement are true, but you know the motivation of the NBA union guys, it looks like they want to suppress top end salaries and entry level salaries and help the middle class salaries. They don't care much about the fringe guys.
You're forgetting that the human beings being drafted are not members of the union.
lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:I understand the ostensible rationale for sports drafts, but the fact of the matter is they're combinations in restraint of trade more designed to hold down salaries than to foster competition and we wink at their illegality in the name of sport.
They're not illegal if they're collectively bargained with the union. The other parts of your statement are true, but you know the motivation of the NBA union guys, it looks like they want to suppress top end salaries and entry level salaries and help the middle class salaries. They don't care much about the fringe guys.
You're forgetting that the human beings being drafted are not members of the union.
Wasn't that a Scott Boras argument in one of the lawsuits that he lost?
JFLNYC wrote:lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:lethal wrote:JFLNYC wrote:I understand the ostensible rationale for sports drafts, but the fact of the matter is they're combinations in restraint of trade more designed to hold down salaries than to foster competition and we wink at their illegality in the name of sport.
They're not illegal if they're collectively bargained with the union. The other parts of your statement are true, but you know the motivation of the NBA union guys, it looks like they want to suppress top end salaries and entry level salaries and help the middle class salaries. They don't care much about the fringe guys.
You're forgetting that the human beings being drafted are not members of the union.
Wasn't that a Scott Boras argument in one of the lawsuits that he lost?
Which lawsuit was that?
traderdave wrote:"Tellem might try to direct Embiid to a certain franchise and not have him go through a physical or interview for any team but the team he wants Embiid to play for next season"
Probably unjustified but this kind of shit drives me up a wall. It is not good enough that this fucking guy is going to make tens of millions putting a ball into a hoop but he has to pick the team he will play for too? Gimme a break. If I am a GM and this guy will not consent to a physical and/or an interview I figure he has got something to hide and I tell him to go fuck himself. If this stuff is true, I hope he drops into the second round**.
**I know he will not drop into the second round.
@JaredDudley619
RT @JonesOnTheNBA: Can we please end the NBA draft lottery being "fixed" bs? If this doesn't convince you, I don't know what will. ( true!)
Youseff wrote:@JaredDudley619
RT @JonesOnTheNBA: Can we please end the NBA draft lottery being "fixed" bs? If this doesn't convince you, I don't know what will. ( true!)
https://twitter.com/JaredDudley619/stat ... 8522186752