thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:pap was the one who used it as an argument against puig being in the all start game
CalvinBall wrote:pap was the one who used it as an argument against puig being in the all start game
CalvinBall wrote:pap's point was he hasnt played enough, olneys point is pap also does not play that much.
Ace Rothstein wrote:CalvinBall wrote:pap's point was he hasnt played enough, olneys point is pap also does not play that much.
He is comparing a starting OF to a RP, there in itself shows the ignorance of that comment....as Pac said if that's the case there wouldn't be any pitchers worth being all stars
CalvinBall wrote:pap's point was he hasnt played enough, olneys point is pap also does not play that much.
CalvinBall wrote:which part do you disagree with?
Shore wrote:CalvinBall wrote:which part do you disagree with?
OF aren't selected instead of RP. OF are selected instead of other OF.
Pap plays as often as his role demands, typically 50 to 70 high-leverage innings. It's his job description. Sometimes he's selected to the all star team, over other pitchers who pitch typically the same number of innings, in the same or similar situations.
Puig has played 27 of the Dodgers 82 games this year. His role, the role in which he is competing for an all star spot, generally demands 140 to 155 games in a year, 85 to 95%. He's played in 33% of his team's games. I believe there are 63 NL outfielders with more games played than him so far, in the role he's allegedly an all star.
In order to qualify for the batting title, I believe you need 3.1 AB per team game. You can still win without that, but to calculate, they add enough AB to qualify you, with no additional hits. Thus, Puig's AVG (a ridiculous .443) computes to .185 for batting title purposes. That gives you an idea of how little he's played.