ReadingPhilly wrote:deitch insisting they want to make a major trade and this is a security blanket if they can't do so.
heyeaglefn wrote:JFLNYC wrote:Byrd will not move the needle enough in any way to be significant, so why Rube had to move so quickly is anyone's guess. But, really, was there a better available alternative at a reasonable price?
By signing someone this early, they are guessing that there wasn't. But counting on a 36 year old Byrd who magically had a career season last year to keep it up is probably not the best thing.
Eem wrote:ReadingPhilly wrote:deitch insisting they want to make a major trade and this is a security blanket if they can't do so.
Do you sign your security blanket before making a major move?
Woody wrote:This is such a neo-Ruben move; hopefully it's only just to set up a WHALE HUNT
my cousin mose wrote:Woody wrote:This is such a neo-Ruben move; hopefully it's only just to set up a WHALE HUNT
What do you mean? We Got Him!! We Got Rube's Whale!!!!!!
Grotewold wrote:FWIW, Fangraphs predicted 2/15 for Byrd
yeah Deitch mentions Stanton (haha), Kemp, Cespedes
ReadingPhilly wrote:Grotewold wrote:FWIW, Fangraphs predicted 2/15 for Byrd
yeah Deitch mentions Stanton (haha), Kemp, Cespedes
feel like joey bats could be surprise play.
It’s not an offseason until Ruben Amaro comes flailing into the free agent market like a freshly birthed giraffe. And we didn’t have to wait too long this go around. The timing is, to say the least, distressing. Handing Byrd something substantially more than a low risk one off affair long before any of the most coveted outfielders in free agency are off the table suggests either that Amaro is establishing some cost certainty before pursuing an even less advisable contract, or plans on bestowing upon Byrd the Delmon Young Memorial “Inexplicably Penciled-In Starter” Prize for 2014.
heyeaglefn wrote:kruker wrote:I'm fine with this. Could have been much worse. I expect him to suck, but at least it'll be on a 2 year deal.
You are fine with them signing a player for 2 years at 8 million at the beginning of FA because it could have been much worse? Is this really what we've come to expect?