My new home baby!!

z ipper wrote:is there a predict their record topiv??
SK790 wrote:bleh wrote:SK790 wrote:Too late. Sports on Earth has us behind the MetsKyle Kendrick and John Lannan at the back of the rotation will spell disaster. I see the unit being good to start the season, but as injuries take their toll on the team behind them and the Mets' young pitchers step up, I think the Mets will pass them both in overall quality of rotation and in the standings. Understand: this is nothing against Hamels or Lee. I just don't think the pieces around them will allow them succeed this year to the level they have in the past.
Love how they talk about Halladay being in decline but the Mets are depending on Johan Santana and Shaun Marcum who can't even get on the field. They're basically saying Matt Harvey and Zach Wheeler who have pitched a combined 10 major league games are better than Hamels & Lee.
Unless these are the supposed young hurlers who are going to step up:
Niese: 26, career 4.06 ERA
Gee; 26, career 4.06 ERA
Hefner: 27, career 5.09 ERA
Lannan: 28, career 4.01 ERA
Kendrick: 28, career 4.30 ERA
A lot of his Mets analysis depended on Niese being the great pitcher he was the 2nd half of 2012 and Harvey and Wheeler becoming quality MLB pitchers fast. Niese's BABIP went from around .315-.335 in 2009-2011 to .272 last year. His LD% stayed roughly the same, while his GB% actually went down. I don't think relying on a 2012 Jon Niese as the crux of your argument is a good bet.
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
jerseyhoya wrote:My hatred of quote boxes in signatures has reached a new high
BigEd76 wrote:Brookover says get used to this next year:
Joseph
Howard/Galvis/Rollins/Asche
Ruf or Gillies/Revere/Brown
Hamels/Lee/Biddle? Pettibone? Martin? Morgan?
It's entirely conceivable that the opening-day lineup in 2014 could have Cody Asche at third base, Freddy Galvis at second, and Tommy Joseph at catcher.