The Crimson Cyclone wrote:well unless a more recent case pops up then it always be left up in the air as this isn't going to trial
Monkeyboy wrote:The Crimson Cyclone wrote:well unless a more recent case pops up then it always be left up in the air as this isn't going to trial
So guilty it is!!
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
Houshphandzadeh wrote:I get real mixed up about this kind of thing when I read something like this:LINDA STELLA said that she was just a girl when Bill Conlin pulled her onto his lap and began "flexing his leg muscles" during a family birthday party at his house in South Jersey. She leaped off his lap and looked back. She felt confused when she saw the wet spot at the crotch of his white pants.
"I was a kid, I didn't know what it really was," Stella told the Daily News last night. "It looked like he had peed in his pants."
Stella, who was friends with Conlin's daughter at the time, said that she tried to avoid Conlin after that. But later, the burly former Daily News sports columnist, in two separate incidents, grabbed her by the arm, pulled her into his bedroom, forced her onto his bed and fondled her breasts and genitals, she said.
I don't want to doubt the third paragraph, but the first two are so preposterous I have to
And we have all these documented cases of group hysteria, false accusations, etc.
Rev_Beezer wrote:Sorry about my half-meltdown in this thread yesterday, everyone. Horrible day yesterday. I wrecked the church bus while driving the youth group to Christmas caroling at local retirement homes, and my uncle died. Note to self- don't post when having a bad day.
danrosz wrote:I find this evidence to be more compelling than Sandusky and Fine situations.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
The Crimson Cyclone wrote:danrosz wrote:I find this evidence to be more compelling than Sandusky and Fine situations.
gee, the eye witness in the locker room shower wasn't compelling enough?
The Crimson Cyclone wrote:danrosz wrote:I find this evidence to be more compelling than Sandusky and Fine situations.
gee, the eye witness in the locker room shower wasn't compelling enough?
Bucky wrote:they should take it to judge judy
or at least judge reinhold
jerseyhoya wrote:I think the reason you get yelled at is you appear to hate listening to sports talk radio, but regularly listen to sports talk radio, and then frequently post about how bad listening to sports talk radio is after you were once again listening to it.
phdave wrote:"[W]hile the Delaware Valley WIPeed itself . . . " Bill wrote.
phdave wrote:"[W]hile the Delaware Valley WIPeed itself . . . " Bill wrote.