The OLD Halladay/Smug thread is HERE

by **kimbatiste** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:09:09

SideshowBob wrote:
slamjim wrote:Oh no, what if uniform number 32 is the deal breaker??

Give him 23 and tell him it's like a mirror image when he's looking at the jersey in the locker and if he were wearing it, it would be "correct".

23 is also retired

by **Bakestar** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:15:00

Carlton would be too frightened to approach the team if they gave Halladay #32, he's hiding in his Compound. From Roobin.

by **td11** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:17:38

Trent Steele wrote:read this and look at the awesomeness of the picture

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/w ... .phillies/

if this doesn't make your heart swell with pride or create a tingling in your groin you are likely not alive

by **Trent Steele** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:19:36

td11 wrote:
Trent Steele wrote:read this and look at the awesomeness of the picture

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/w ... .phillies/

if this doesn't make your heart swell with pride or create a tingling in your groin you are likely not alive

eagles are still a better organization

/danrosz

by **dajafi** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:23:51

I'm cackling like the offspring of Hillary Clinton and a Bond villain

by **philliesphhan** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:24:52

Trent Steele wrote:read this and look at the awesomeness of the picture

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/w ... .phillies/

If this goes down, that needs to be everyone's avatar.

Also, number 23 is taken by Schneider :shock:

by **slamjim** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:28:13

He doesn't need a uniform number

by **philliesphhan** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:29:20

That's disturbing

by **Woody** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:30:28

Woody wrote:

on a scale of one to ten, i love this

by **Harpua** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:31:34

slamjim wrote:He doesn't need a uniform number

If Rube gets Halladay to be a Phillies in a good deal, he can make the players wear an outline of his giant set of balls instead of numbers, I don't care.

by **Bakestar** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:40:48

Woody wrote:

by **Barry Jive** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 00:43:44

i don't want to see it get to Red. no one does.

by **swishnicholson** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 01:08:16

philliesphhan wrote:That's disturbing

If the deal is that in order to get Halladay the team has to change its name to the Rubens, I can live with that.

by **jerseyhoya** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 01:10:05

Barry Jive wrote:i don't want to see it get to Red. no one does.

I do. He'll be mooning people when we get Halladay for Kendrix and Gose.

by **The Savior** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 01:18:51

jerseyhoya wrote:
Barry Jive wrote:i don't want to see it get to Red. no one does.

I do. He'll be mooning people when we get Halladay for Moyer

This.

by **my cousin mose** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 01:40:39

WHADDYAMEAN THERE'S NO NEW UPDATES ON HALLADAY AT 1240AM

by **Rococo4** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 02:11:20

what if we got him

by **FTN** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 02:16:04

Rococo4 wrote:what if we got him

the mets would only finish 5 games ahead of us

by **FTN** » Fri Dec 11, 2009 04:58:08

And especially Halladay. Toronto is aware which teams it should talk to about Halladay, who has the right to veto any deal and thus can pick his destination. But the Blue Jays are looking for top-notch prospects with little or no big-league experience so they can keep them for an extended time.

(One person in the know said Philadelphia, which looked at Halladay in July before getting Cliff Lee instead, has a "10 percent" chance at getting Halladay this winter.)

Once upon a time, general managers attended the World Series and began face-to-face discussions. Those would pick up at the GM meetings, and action would culminate at the Winter Meetings.

http://mlb.fanhouse.com/2009/12/10/afte ... s-of-summ/

Archived

The OLD Halladay/Smug thread is HERE