The Official Hate the Mets Thread v3.0

by **VFB** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 16:30:37

can we get a mets refugees update on the perez situation. sure to be some hilarious comments over there.

by **jerseyhoya** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 16:39:46

VFB wrote:can we get a mets refugees update on the perez situation. sure to be some hilarious comments over there.

They're worried that he is too lazy and fat.

Oliver Perez and the weight thing

by **FTN** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 16:44:38

disappointed that they changed the layout over there

by **TenuredVulture** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 16:48:14

They have a lot of political threads over there. I guess talking about politics is a lot more fun than talking about the Mets.

by **VFB** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 17:10:51

"We sent Ollie down to Mexico with $10 million dollars, a duffle bag of doritos, and an index card with some conditioning exercises. I blame the WBC."

by **pacino** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 17:57:19

I'm very disappointed in all the threads with responses over there. They should go back to one thread for one thought.

by **TenuredVulture** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 18:00:46

pacino wrote:I'm very disappointed in all the threads with responses over there. They should go back to one thread for one thought.

Steagles could start posting there.

by **steagles** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 18:06:26

TenuredVulture wrote:
pacino wrote:I'm very disappointed in all the threads with responses over there. They should go back to one thread for one thought.

Steagles could start posting there.

i already do. i'm gleepglop.

by **Bakestar** » Thu Mar 26, 2009 18:10:48

steagles wrote:
TenuredVulture wrote:
pacino wrote:I'm very disappointed in all the threads with responses over there. They should go back to one thread for one thought.

Steagles could start posting there.
i already do. i'm gleepglop.

Not PoopDoop?

by **GrizzledVeteran** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 08:17:10

My son posted this on his facebook page. I've taught him well.

by **Wizlah** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 08:27:32

GrizzledVeteran wrote:My son posted this on his facebook page. I've taught him well.

He's showing his age. A bit older, and at least 2 of those five would have been the braves.

by **phatj** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 08:41:27

Or the Marlins.

by **Wizlah** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 08:52:26

phatj wrote:Or the Marlins.

I think I only really hated them that one season in 2003 when everyone including themselves described them as underdogs against the big bad phillies. Mike Lowell was coming out with some crap about 'no one expected us to do well or something but here we are' and I thought that the supposedly scrappy nature of the team was manufactured bullshit. The fans I have no respect for, but the players I'm usually okay with.

by **Stay_Disappointed** » Fri Mar 27, 2009 20:58:13

FTN wrote:Mets rotation is utter $#@! at this point. Perez is out of shape, they are trying to remodel Maine's delivery, and Livan Hernandez is their #5.

Why are they trying to remodel Maine's delivery? WTF is up with that guy anyway? During the first half of 2007 everybody thought he was an all-star, although I don't think he ever had much of a pedigree coming over from Baltimore.

I also think they might be putting too much faith in Pelfrey based on one season. He could be nothing more than Kendrick with more velocity.

by **jerseyhoya** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 19:06:15

NYDN:

Sports Illustrated has picked the Mets over the Angels in the 2009 World Series.

American League Division Series: Yankees over Twins; Angels over Red Sox

National League Division Series: Cubs over Phillies; Mets over Dodgers

American League Championship Series: Angels over Yankees

National League Championship Series: Mets over Cubs

WORLD SERIES

Mets over Angels

by **FTN** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 19:24:20

The Angels are lucky if they win 86 games this year.

by **lethal** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 19:34:29

FTN wrote:The Angels are lucky if they win 86 games this year.

And they'd still win that division.

by **smitty** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 19:37:09

FTN wrote:The Angels are lucky if they win 86 games this year.

Isn't like 60 percent of their starting rotation going to begin the year on the DL -- Lackey; Escobar and Santana? Is that right? Cripes, they play in my local Mariner's division --- I should know this stuff.

Scioscia = genius so there's that.

by **FTN** » Tue Mar 31, 2009 19:48:46

lethal wrote:
FTN wrote:The Angels are lucky if they win 86 games this year.

And they'd still win that division.

nah. I think people are underestimating Oakland. And Texas has the best offense in the division. If they get any contribution from some of their promising young arms, they could be in the running. I think Texas, Oakland and LA are 82-87 win teams, Seattle is a 75 win team.

by **ReadingPhilly** » Wed Apr 01, 2009 20:03:09

Mets vs Padres
Mon, April 13, 2009
Price Range $200.00- $90000.00

Archived

The Official Hate the Mets Thread v3.0