philliesphhan wrote:What about Ebbets Field? I think it's modeled after it from the outside anyway
Great, why don't they hit up that massive agricultural concern, "EBBET'S EGGS & DAIRY" to get a $12,000.00 sponsorship.
philliesphhan wrote:What about Ebbets Field? I think it's modeled after it from the outside anyway
swishnicholson wrote:Bakestar wrote:Have they hit up Ralph Lauren, in an attempt to name the stadium Polo Grounds? At least that'd be somewhat historically relevant...![]()
You wonder how Metropolitan Life could have turned down the association.
Bucky wrote:So is this an acknowledgement that stadium naming is not generally a sound investment and is more a vanity measure?
lethal wrote:It really looks like the Mets are going to lose the Citifield sponsorship.
FTN wrote:lethal wrote:It really looks like the Mets are going to lose the Citifield sponsorship.
writeup in the WSJ today said that Citi maybe wants to get out of it, but they might not be able to without paying a big breakup fee
Bakestar wrote:I live in northern NJ and I make it a point not to wear a Phillies hat or other gear into a place that prepares food. I'm serious. I've been called some terrible things.
FTN wrote:lethal wrote:It really looks like the Mets are going to lose the Citifield sponsorship.
writeup in the WSJ today said that Citi maybe wants to get out of it, but they might not be able to without paying a big breakup fee
oh I get it - perp walks, perpetuity...swishnicholson wrote:Bakestar wrote:Have they hit up Ralph Lauren, in an attempt to name the stadium Polo Grounds? At least that'd be somewhat historically relevant...![]()
You wonder how Metropolitan Life could have turned down the association.
My own preference would be to name the field after Daryl Strawberry, in perpetuity.
Bill McNeal wrote:City Scape adult novelties or blimpie?