Barry Jive wrote:wow. the Phillies signed an older, worse Randy Johnson for twice the cash commitment.
Barry Jive wrote:wow. the Phillies signed an older, worse Randy Johnson for twice the cash commitment.
MattS wrote:Tim Redding to the Mets, 1 year, $2.25MM.
Projected ERAs have him between 4.61 and 5.28, with most sitting around 5. He's probably worth a win or so over replacement level. If you go through most of the projections, we probably have a 3-4 game advantage over the Mets right now, approximately equal to the value of, say, Derek Lowe. Probably another photofinish coming up in '09.
MattS wrote:Tim Redding to the Mets, 1 year, $2.25MM.
Projected ERAs have him between 4.61 and 5.28, with most sitting around 5. He's probably worth a win or so over replacement level. If you go through most of the projections, we probably have a 3-4 game advantage over the Mets right now, approximately equal to the value of, say, Derek Lowe. Probably another photofinish coming up in '09.
Warszawa wrote:MattS wrote:Tim Redding to the Mets, 1 year, $2.25MM.
Projected ERAs have him between 4.61 and 5.28, with most sitting around 5. He's probably worth a win or so over replacement level. If you go through most of the projections, we probably have a 3-4 game advantage over the Mets right now, approximately equal to the value of, say, Derek Lowe. Probably another photofinish coming up in '09.
Line up Redding for the Phillies?
MattS wrote:Warszawa wrote:MattS wrote:Tim Redding to the Mets, 1 year, $2.25MM.
Projected ERAs have him between 4.61 and 5.28, with most sitting around 5. He's probably worth a win or so over replacement level. If you go through most of the projections, we probably have a 3-4 game advantage over the Mets right now, approximately equal to the value of, say, Derek Lowe. Probably another photofinish coming up in '09.
Line up Redding for the Phillies?
haha. bring it on. the very fact that omar minaya probably signed redding on the basis that he had some success against the phillies is the reason why i remain optimistic about the phillies and mets in this era. amaro may not be the sharpest tool in the shed, but at least he isn't minaya. every move minaya makes me think he won some kind of WFAN call-in-and-you-get-to-be-the-mets-GM contest. the bullpen had an off year? trade everyone who you're mad at, and sign whoever has closing experience, all while neglecting to fill your rotation and your your giant holes in your lineup. refuses to trade his best prospect because he's heard of him. all that stuff just shows how incredible inept he is, and how even amaro is bound to outsmart him.
ek wrote:Milton Bradley 3 years 30 million to the Cubs
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
MattS wrote:Tim Redding to the Mets, 1 year, $2.25MM.
Projected ERAs have him between 4.61 and 5.28, with most sitting around 5. He's probably worth a win or so over replacement level. If you go through most of the projections, we probably have a 3-4 game advantage over the Mets right now, approximately equal to the value of, say, Derek Lowe. Probably another photofinish coming up in '09.
Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com reports that the Red Sox have agreed to terms with Takashi Saito on a one-year contract with a team option for 2010.
According to Rosenthal, the deal includes around $2 million in guaranteed money with an additional $5 million or so in potential incentives. Elbow problems make the 39-year-old Saito a question mark, but when healthy he's been one of the most dominant relievers in baseball over the past three seasons, saving 81 games with a 1.95 ERA and 245/52 K/BB ratio in 189 2/3 innings. Much like the John Smoltz and Rocco Baldelli signings, Saito represents a low-risk, high-upside gamble for Boston.