Ace Rothstein wrote:Is Colon on their 40 man yet ??
No sir.
Ace Rothstein wrote:Is Colon on their 40 man yet ??
jeff2sf wrote:No, Flop, Ashton is completely right here. Whether the spot's available or not is immaterial. It's an opportunity cost that did not need to be spent. He was theirs, off the 40 man, with no cost but 25K measly dollars. And instead to save 25, they lock up a valuable 40 man spot that could be necessary later on (it might be immediate if they have any NRIs that will make the team, or it might take a while).
If he was so meritorious of a 40 man spot in March, they shouldn't have left him off in December. Just a bad job by the Red Sox.
Holdzkom was selected by the Phillies in last December's Rule 5 Draft. However, the Phils -- as is their right -- offered him back to the Red Sox.
But Holdzkom opted for free agency, as was his right, and the Red Sox have signed him to a Major League contract. He reported to Fort Myers on Thursday.
jeff2sf wrote:Are you sure you have the right, before the team decides to buy you back, to opt for free agency? I've never seen that before, one would think people would opt for it all the time. If you are definitely correct, then I retract what I said. It's not really a great move by the Sox (again, what was so different in March than December?), but it's not a dumb move.
phuturephillies wrote:jeff2sf wrote:Are you sure you have the right, before the team decides to buy you back, to opt for free agency? I've never seen that before, one would think people would opt for it all the time. If you are definitely correct, then I retract what I said. It's not really a great move by the Sox (again, what was so different in March than December?), but it's not a dumb move.
Holdzkom had been Rule 5'd twice before, so maybe the third time you are selected in this manner you can opt for free agency.
lethal wrote:phuturephillies wrote:jeff2sf wrote:Are you sure you have the right, before the team decides to buy you back, to opt for free agency? I've never seen that before, one would think people would opt for it all the time. If you are definitely correct, then I retract what I said. It's not really a great move by the Sox (again, what was so different in March than December?), but it's not a dumb move.
Holdzkom had been Rule 5'd twice before, so maybe the third time you are selected in this manner you can opt for free agency.
He might've otherwise been a 6 year free agent if he was not a Rule 5 pick.
The Red Tornado wrote:I dont like Rosterbot I like getting my news from people
6. You will be civil. You will not personally attack other members.