The Savior wrote:CalvinBall wrote:An insignificant amount if any will vote for Trump because they dislike Abrams. Your feeling is not founded in any reality or data.
What is the foundation of this statement
Polling
The Savior wrote:CalvinBall wrote:An insignificant amount if any will vote for Trump because they dislike Abrams. Your feeling is not founded in any reality or data.
What is the foundation of this statement
jamiethekiller wrote:can't believe we nominated a person that is so old that we actually care that his VP can be a successful successor if he dies of OLD AGE.
the democratic party is a sham
heyeaglefn wrote:jamiethekiller wrote:can't believe we nominated a person that is so old that we actually care that his VP can be a successful successor if he dies of OLD AGE.
the democratic party is a sham
Yeah I mean when your choices are Bernie, Bloomberg, Warren and Biden you are going to have to think about this situation.
td11 wrote:The GOP has always had open contempt for democratic voters, but trump has escalated it to new levels.
The president openly tweets about how much he hates the democrats and their voters, meanwhile dems have to tread lightly about even saying "the GOP is bad."
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
slugsrbad wrote:There seems to be slight momentum with the Tara Reade accusations, with more collaborators coming forward. Biden’s campaign will need to address it more specifically.
And yes there’s a double standard here since Trump has a plethora of credible accusers and it doesn’t amount to anything.
http://www.businessinsider.com/former-n ... 20-4%3famp
JUburton wrote:I think they're just going to ignore it and it's probably the right call, politically. It's all awful.
slugsrbad wrote:There seems to be slight momentum with the Tara Reade accusations, with more collaborators coming forward. Biden’s campaign will need to address it more specifically.
And yes there’s a double standard here since Trump has a plethora of credible accusers and it doesn’t amount to anything.
http://www.businessinsider.com/former-n ... 20-4%3famp
thephan wrote:slugsrbad wrote:There seems to be slight momentum with the Tara Reade accusations, with more collaborators coming forward. Biden’s campaign will need to address it more specifically.
And yes there’s a double standard here since Trump has a plethora of credible accusers and it doesn’t amount to anything.
http://www.businessinsider.com/former-n ... 20-4%3famp
Follow the link and got a 404.Yet a status of "Whoops! Something went wrong." seems appropriate.
06hawkalum wrote:JUburton wrote:I think they're just going to ignore it and it's probably the right call, politically. It's all awful.
Bingo. It's not like people are going to think "I am alarmed by this isolated allegation of sexual assault so I am going to vote for the guy with 24 allegations of rape/assault, including one each from a 12 and 13-year old child."
Better to just ignore it, because Trump is certainly not going to focus on it, knowing he has no leg to stand on in that department.
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
Uncle Milty wrote:slugsrbad wrote:There seems to be slight momentum with the Tara Reade accusations, with more collaborators coming forward. Biden’s campaign will need to address it more specifically.
And yes there’s a double standard here since Trump has a plethora of credible accusers and it doesn’t amount to anything.
http://www.businessinsider.com/former-n ... 20-4%3famp
Link not working
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
06hawkalum wrote:JUburton wrote:I think they're just going to ignore it and it's probably the right call, politically. It's all awful.
Bingo. It's not like people are going to think "I am alarmed by this isolated allegation of sexual assault so I am going to vote for the guy with 24 allegations of rape/assault, including one each from a 12 and 13-year old child."
Better to just ignore it, because Trump is certainly not going to focus on it, knowing he has no leg to stand on in that department.
td11 wrote:06hawkalum wrote:JUburton wrote:I think they're just going to ignore it and it's probably the right call, politically. It's all awful.
Bingo. It's not like people are going to think "I am alarmed by this isolated allegation of sexual assault so I am going to vote for the guy with 24 allegations of rape/assault, including one each from a 12 and 13-year old child."
Better to just ignore it, because Trump is certainly not going to focus on it, knowing he has no leg to stand on in that department.
Lmao if you think trump won't hammer him on the reade stuff. Hypocrisy is not a problem
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jamiethekiller wrote:And those things don't bother most Republican voters. Democrats will just stay home. Not switch votes.