06hawkalum wrote:Or just demoralize enough Trumpers that they stay home on Election Day.

This is the winning plan. You may convince some to not vote for Trump. Convincing them to vote for a Dem is a different, more difficult battle.

@AmbJohnBolton
Re: speaking up -- since resigning as National Security Advisor, the @WhiteHouse refused to return access to my personal Twitter account. Out of fear of what I may say? To those who speculated I went into hiding, I’m sorry to disappoint!

what is going on with that? an old man with a mustache is trolling people about impeachment?

CalvinBall wrote:what is going on with that? an old man with a mustache is trolling people about impeachment?

Gonna guess he's trolling Trump.

for my money, it just doesn't get any better than when he does "when a man trolls a loser"

momadance wrote:@AmbJohnBolton
Re: speaking up -- since resigning as National Security Advisor, the @WhiteHouse refused to return access to my personal Twitter account. Out of fear of what I may say? To those who speculated I went into hiding, I’m sorry to disappoint!

My goodness we need to get this guy under oath ASAP.

Vindman really didn't want to get pregnant

https://twitter.com/drewlgoins/status/1 ... 6821261314

Uncle Milty wrote:

06hawkalum wrote:Or just demoralize enough Trumpers that they stay home on Election Day.

This is the winning plan. You may convince some to not vote for Trump. Convincing them to vote for a Dem is a different, more difficult battle.

Unfortunately a failed Senate trial leading to Trump strutting around crowing he’s been exonerated yet again may yield the opposite result.

momadance wrote:

Warszawa wrote:can monday's court decision on McGahn be appealed?

Yep.

According to this thread, the appeal won't apply to Bolton, only McGahn. So the ruling on Monday could free up Bolton to testify regardless of McGahn's appeal.

https://mobile.twitter.com/rgoodlaw/sta ... 4407655424

two months ago trump wanted to ban e-cigs. now he is basically holding an e-cig summit at the white house.

i have heard he is very firm in his many, well researched beliefs.

He’s been told the political fallout from banning e-cigs would not be good.

Bolton could testify that Trump invited Putin to run the 2020 elections and it wouldn’t cause one Republican senator to vote to remove Trump.

us regular listeners of freakonomics pod are aware that otc e-cigs are not responsible for the health issues

Looks like Trump may be a bit disappointed by the long awaited DOJ report. It criticizes the FBI for missteps but absolves the Top Leaders out of acting on Anti-Trump bias.

Bucky wrote:us regular listeners of freakonomics pod are aware that otc e-cigs are not responsible for the health issues

Me thinks the vapor causing popcorn lung is a side effect. Seem obvious.

JFLNYC wrote:

Uncle Milty wrote:

06hawkalum wrote:Or just demoralize enough Trumpers that they stay home on Election Day.

This is the winning plan. You may convince some to not vote for Trump. Convincing them to vote for a Dem is a different, more difficult battle.

Unfortunately a failed Senate trial leading to Trump strutting around crowing he’s been exonerated yet again may yield the opposite result.

Exactly my fear.

in IMPORTANT news, ariana grande endorses bernie sanders. thank you ari.

OAAN go with Fiona Hill and Lt. Col Alexander Vindmanwere as not real Americans.

Hannity says he k knows more about Ukraine then Hill. Impressive.

Bucky wrote:us regular listeners of freakonomics pod are aware that otc e-cigs are not responsible for the health issues

Was a good episode

Cnn reporting Parnas willing to tell Congress about meeting with Nunes where Nunes was seeking dirt on the Bidens. My god.