Monkeyboy wrote:I guess you don't know what the word maybe means. Maybe can be much less than 50%. It's also not a nonsense idea when you have people trying to tear down our institutions like the GOP has been doing. It sure seems like anything is in play, even if unlikely.

jerseyhoya wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:I guess you don't know what the word maybe means. Maybe can be much less than 50%. It's also not a nonsense idea when you have people trying to tear down our institutions like the GOP has been doing. It sure seems like anything is in play, even if unlikely.

The chance the legislative filibuster is abolished this Congress is approximately equal to us all growing wings and being able to fly this Congress. So I guess that's a maybe.

Monkeyboy wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:

Monkeyboy wrote:

jerseyhoya wrote:Also maybe we'll all grow wings and be able to fly

well the president wants it to happen and the GOP is a party of bootlickers so.....

Or should I say the grand dragon, stephen miller, wants it to happen.

You're the guy supporting what is pretty much an evil group of people doing a lot of evil things that you support. So you look a hell of a lot worse than I do. Keep that in mind when you're throwing around the sarcasm and/or personal shots. Or you can just do you and we can judge you based on that. Your choice.

You float a nonsense idea, assert the GOP licks Trump's boots, point out he is demanding a change, but you agree that they're highly unlikely to act on his request.

Top notch #analysis

I guess you don't know what the word maybe means. Maybe can be much less than 50%. It's also not a nonsense idea when you have people trying to tear down our institutions like the GOP has been doing. It sure seems like anything is in play, even if unlikely.

I get that you want to point out that you think I'm stupid every chance you get, but you are the one thinking trickle down economics works, so you look either really stupid or willfully ignorant. At this point, someone would have to be one of those two things to believe that stuff works. You just think poor people should suffer. Like I said, you look a lot worse than I do. I mean, this is your chosen livelihood. I'm just a science teacher throwing out thoughts here and there. Maybe I'm naive about some of this stuff, but at least I care about others.

Oh, and the GOP has been a bunch of bootlickers. Or do we need to review the meeting of pence and others kissing Trump's wannabe dictator ass?

thephan wrote:JfC people. Lay off the only republican you ever interact with. JH is not a sociopath, psychopath, disgusting human, traitor to the country, etc. Part of the growing problem in the US is an unwillingness to listen, and thoughtfully engage with people you do not completely agree with. Eventually you slide over to not listening at all, and "engagement" is as partisan, polarized, and dogmatic as the perceived offense being decried. Without seeking common ground, there is no chance of compromise, or consensus on the common good.

06hawkalum wrote:

thephan wrote:JfC people. Lay off the only republican you ever interact with. JH is not a sociopath, psychopath, disgusting human, traitor to the country, etc. Part of the growing problem in the US is an unwillingness to listen, and thoughtfully engage with people you do not completely agree with. Eventually you slide over to not listening at all, and "engagement" is as partisan, polarized, and dogmatic as the perceived offense being decried. Without seeking common ground, there is no chance of compromise, or consensus on the common good.

"I have no empathy for humans."

His words, not mine.

It's not as though "sociopath" is a slur. You're born that way.

thephan wrote:JfC people. Lay off the only republican you ever interact with. JH is not a sociopath, psychopath, disgusting human, traitor to the country, etc. Part of the growing problem in the US is an unwillingness to listen, and thoughtfully engage with people you do not completely agree with. Eventually you slide over to not listening at all, and "engagement" is as partisan, polarized, and dogmatic as the perceived offense being decried. Without seeking common ground, there is no chance of compromise, or consensus on the common good.

06hawkalum wrote:I don't think JH is stupid. He is a sociopath though. In another thread he said he has no empathy for humans, only dogs. That pretty much sums up the mindset of the modern Republican. WTF happened to the sane Republicans of the past, like Nelson Rockefeller?

slugsrbad wrote:He's a Giant fan rooting for the Patriots.

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:

slugsrbad wrote:He's a Giant fan rooting for the Patriots.

He's a monster!

jerseyhoya wrote:

06hawkalum wrote:I don't think JH is stupid. He is a sociopath though. In another thread he said he has no empathy for humans, only dogs. That pretty much sums up the mindset of the modern Republican. WTF happened to the sane Republicans of the past, like Nelson Rockefeller?

Though I do like most dogs more than I like most human beings.

thephan wrote:JfC people. Lay off the only republican you ever interact with. JH is not a sociopath, psychopath, disgusting human, traitor to the country, etc. Part of the growing problem in the US is an unwillingness to listen, and thoughtfully engage with people you do not completely agree with. Eventually you slide over to not listening at all, and "engagement" is as partisan, polarized, and dogmatic as the perceived offense being decried. Without seeking common ground, there is no chance of compromise, or consensus on the common good.

jerseyhoya wrote:

The Crimson Cyclone wrote:

slugsrbad wrote:He's a Giant fan rooting for the Patriots.

He's a monster!

All good Giants fans are rooting for the Patriots.

TV is a GINO.