The whole conceit is fairly faithful.The Dude wrote:Not even sure why they used the Annihilation book as source material
JUburton wrote:The whole conceit is fairly faithful.The Dude wrote:Not even sure why they used the Annihilation book as source material
Garland said he read the book once and then wrote the screenplay much later. He wanted it to be its own thing.
Hm, I thought the feel was pretty similar but yeah, the motivation/story very different.The Dude wrote:JUburton wrote:The whole conceit is fairly faithful.The Dude wrote:Not even sure why they used the Annihilation book as source material
Garland said he read the book once and then wrote the screenplay much later. He wanted it to be its own thing.
Idk, her motivations are completely different, her character is completely different. Just had a call moletely different feel to me
The Dude wrote:My boring thoughts:[Reveal] Spoiler:I think there are two completely different feels between the book and movie. The book is much more of a psychological thing, bc she's on her own most of the time, the group is slowly going crazy and trying to kill each other. The movie is a scary monster movie (until the very end) with some of the aspects of the novel. The whole reason the book is called "Annihilation" is so creepy and cool and a mindfuck, and the control the psychologist has over them and everything, which causes them to doubt everything they do, and there's nothing like that in the movie. I already mentioned how different her character and motivations were, too. It just didn't feel as creepy as the book, and it definitely wasn't as tense, to me.
JUburton wrote:I didn't think it was bad at all!
PTOITWCFTPP wrote:JUburton wrote:I didn't think it was bad at all!
Was terrible