Gimpy wrote:I remember reading in Outliers a while ago that the achievement gap is less about the schools themselves and has more to do with students from poorer backgrounds not getting educated over the summer. Apparently they tend to show similar improvement over the course of the school year, but have worse retention issues since their parents don't enroll them in programs and whatnot over their months off.
I haven't really done any research on the topic so I'm reluctant to throw it out there as a fact though.
CalvinBall wrote:Gimpy wrote:I remember reading in Outliers a while ago that the achievement gap is less about the schools themselves and has more to do with students from poorer backgrounds not getting educated over the summer. Apparently they tend to show similar improvement over the course of the school year, but have worse retention issues since their parents don't enroll them in programs and whatnot over their months off.
I haven't really done any research on the topic so I'm reluctant to throw it out there as a fact though.
interesting, but dont a lot of people think gladwell is a crackpot?
slugsrbad wrote:pacino wrote:he didnt answer my question
Mine either, he kind of touched on it, but not really.
jamiethekiller wrote:CalvinBall wrote:Gimpy wrote:I remember reading in Outliers a while ago that the achievement gap is less about the schools themselves and has more to do with students from poorer backgrounds not getting educated over the summer. Apparently they tend to show similar improvement over the course of the school year, but have worse retention issues since their parents don't enroll them in programs and whatnot over their months off.
I haven't really done any research on the topic so I'm reluctant to throw it out there as a fact though.
interesting, but dont a lot of people think gladwell is a crackpot?
he has some good stuff. some of it is baseless speculation that has statistics manipulated to support an argument.
Warszawa wrote:slugsrbad wrote:pacino wrote:he didnt answer my question
Mine either, he kind of touched on it, but not really.
Mine either! Someone must have been jamming the internet lines!
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
td11 wrote:https://twitter.com/readerer/status/832303185826033664
"ever heard of uranium? you #$!&@ idiot. #$!&@ moron."
Rachel Riederer @readerer 1h1 hour ago
I had that press conference playing on my laptop for what, 20 or 30 minutes? And both the orchids in my apartment died.
RichmondPhilsFan wrote:This exchange is horrifying.
traderdave wrote:That is hilarious. BTW, anybody interested, this is what President Agent Orange said in that link:
"You know what uranium is right? This thing called nuclear weapons and other things, like, lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things."
Dude is Sarah Palin with a smaller penis.
TenuredVulture wrote:traderdave wrote:That is hilarious. BTW, anybody interested, this is what President Agent Orange said in that link:
"You know what uranium is right? This thing called nuclear weapons and other things, like, lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things."
Dude is Sarah Palin with a smaller penis.
Palin is smarter than Trump.
TenuredVulture wrote:traderdave wrote:That is hilarious. BTW, anybody interested, this is what President Agent Orange said in that link:
"You know what uranium is right? This thing called nuclear weapons and other things, like, lots of things are done with uranium, including some bad things."
Dude is Sarah Palin with a smaller penis.
Palin is smarter than Trump.