We really are back in the 1930's.

The Voyage of the St. Louis

JFLNYC wrote:We really are back in the 1930's.

The Voyage of the St. Louis

this is what republican voters voted for. he campaigned on banning muslims

I'm being serious here. Completely. How long until there are camps? Not death camps, but internment camps.

td11 wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:We really are back in the 1930's.

The Voyage of the St. Louis

this is what republican voters voted for. he campaigned on banning muslims

to be fair, some probably imagined he'd at least consult the Constitution and a few people familiar with our way of governing before he just blundered in and started emitting "orders"

td11 wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:We really are back in the 1930's.

The Voyage of the St. Louis

this is what republican voters voted for. he campaigned on banning muslims

I get it. All those Americans with their flags and their pride who are so ignorant they don't even know we fought a World War to stop this sort of thing.

I have no hope. There's no point in fighting. Fucking Sandyhook truthers are running the country.

Someone edited the Wikipedia page for invertebrates to include Paul Ryan. (Gone now)

Soren wrote:I'm being serious here. Completely. How long until there are camps? Not death camps, but internment camps.

It's all a self-fulfilling prophecy: Trump's actions will radicalize enough young Muslim Americans to precipitate an attack. Trump will respond by attempting to curtail civil liberties of Muslim Americans and we'll be just the smallest step from the camps.

pacino wrote:Az - I'm not defensive, I'm pragmatic and incremental. I try to push what I think is best for us as a people. That usually means Democrats that can try to govern and make deals that will have more good than bad. 'The system' is there for a reason, for which we are currently seeing why.

This is what the new-left/bernie/stein people don't understand. you make changes through tiny incremental steps. There is no other way.

http://freakonomics.com/podcast/in-prai ... mentalism/

drsmooth wrote:

td11 wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:We really are back in the 1930's.

The Voyage of the St. Louis

this is what republican voters voted for. he campaigned on banning muslims

to be fair, some probably imagined he'd at least consult the Constitution and a few people familiar with our way of governing before he just blundered in and started emitting "orders"

Haha. I'm starting to appreciate your sense of humor.

jamiethekiller wrote:

pacino wrote:Az - I'm not defensive, I'm pragmatic and incremental. I try to push what I think is best for us as a people. That usually means Democrats that can try to govern and make deals that will have more good than bad. 'The system' is there for a reason, for which we are currently seeing why.

This is what the new-left/bernie/stein people don't understand. you make changes through tiny incremental steps. There is no other way.

http://freakonomics.com/podcast/in-prai ... mentalism/

no i think they understand incrementalism but disagree with the concept because whatever progress liberals make in tiny steps when they're in power, conservatives take it back in big chunks. that's why they hate every "neoliberal" and think they're basically the same as republicans

Werthless wrote:

drsmooth wrote:

td11 wrote:

JFLNYC wrote:We really are back in the 1930's.

The Voyage of the St. Louis

this is what republican voters voted for. he campaigned on banning muslims

to be fair, some probably imagined he'd at least consult the Constitution and a few people familiar with our way of governing before he just blundered in and started emitting "orders"

Haha. I'm starting to appreciate your sense of humor.

doc smooth owns

Werthless wrote:Haha. I'm starting to appreciate your sense of humor.

And to think it only took a silly little thing like an immigration ban to bring us together

Reports that bannon overuled DHS on this order? Beyond scary.

Have we talked about how Steve Bannon named himself to the National Security Council and how that's probably a really bad thing

our only hope is that he's on his third liver and it's pretty scarred

bc he always looks like he's fighting a whiskey hangover

he's only 63. he looks way worse. hopefully all the cocaine has weakened his heart.

The Dude wrote:bc he always looks like he's fighting a whiskey hangover

During the campaign in happier days Mike Murphy said during his podcast that Bannon always looked like he'd lost a battle with a bottle of Glenlivet. Made me laugh.

can't think of anyone better to run the country than a hungover racist. we think it's bad now, wait til it gets hot