Houshphandzadeh wrote:love Lorenzo's for a basic slice or pie. no one else I know seems to for some reason
TomatoPie wrote:I think that dummies who want a pile of buffalo chicken on their pizza can't always appreciate the ying and yang of a perfectly balanced simple slice of well-made pie.
phatj wrote:TomatoPie wrote:I think that dummies who want a pile of buffalo chicken on their pizza can't always appreciate the ying and yang of a perfectly balanced simple slice of well-made pie.
Pretentious much?
Bucky wrote:Ying
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
phatj wrote:Why are people who eat buffalo chicken pizza dummies?
Chicken, whether by its breeding or its genetics, is bland. It doesn't add much to a slice of pizza that it wouldn't add just as well if served on the side, see what I mean? There's no cosmic synergy in a chicken pizza, no greater-than-the-sum-of-its-partsness.
...buffalo, ranch, and barbecue chicken pizza were created only to cover up poor pizza. That is, it was created in places where the basics—crust, good sauce, good cheese—were not understood or executed well enough, and thus needed an additional dish of food spread on top of it to add flavor.
To sum up: cured meats, like pepperoni, sausage, ham, guanciale, lardo, soppresata, capicola, pancetta, heck, even anchovies = all good. Fresh meats like steak, ground meat, chicken, pork, seared tuna = leave it on the side, thanks.
phatj wrote:I agree that chicken is generally bland (particularly when compared to cured meats but that's not really a fair comparison). But buffalo chicken isn't bland. And I disagree that putting buffalo chicken on a pizza is necessarily a crutch. It's a different kind of pizza. Would your objections go away if it were called Buffalo Chicken Tart instead?