Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

what say you

best movie
29
58%
whatever
19
38%
hate it
2
4%
 
Total votes : 50

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby MoBettle » Sat Jan 16, 2016 13:49:30

The ideas behind the prequels were interesting but manifestation of the ideas on the screen was a bunch of turds. Yeah it's theoretically cool to have a plot about trade routes or gungans among 50 other random universe building plot lines but it doesn't change the fact that it's a movie and you have to watch it.
Two days later I get a text back that says I'm a basketball player and a businessman, not a Thundercat.

MoBettle
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 29294
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 00:45:37
Location: All the way up.

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby wwry » Sat Jan 16, 2016 17:17:03

the prequels are like an alien made them. they are fascinating movies to talk about but dreadful to watch. i don't have an emotional attachment to star wars like a lot of people so i can maybe approach them less nostalgia blinded. i liked them as a kid but wasn't obsessed or anything and saw the first 2 prequels in theaters, the 2nd one completely killed my interest in the franchise. later on i watched em all in chronological order and the prequels were so unbearable they actually dragged down my experience of watching the original movies and i thought star wars was just meh/bad for a while. but before watching the new movie i rewatched the original trilogy and for the first time since i was a child saw the real beauty in them. the first 2 are probably masterpieces and return of the jedi is weird and boring at points but hits great emotional beats, i never realized how perfect darth vader's death scene is. the force awakens was fun and i liked all the new actors and characters. the prequels were bad but george lucas is a unfairly maligned genius. a new hope is my favorite one.
ImageImageImageImage

wwry
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6557
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 22:36:19
Location: bucky hacked me

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby TenuredVulture » Sat Jan 16, 2016 17:56:05

You know, I wonder if you got rid of all the stuff people don't like about the prequels--Jar jar, the long ass pod race, the impossible to follow political maneuvering, and so forth, and just focused on how Anakin became Darth Vader and how he betrayed the Jedi--would you have one really strong movie?
Be Bold!

TenuredVulture
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 53243
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 00:16:10
Location: Magnolia, AR

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby wwry » Sat Jan 16, 2016 18:27:30

aging up anakin from the beginning would have been good. at least it would have spared an innocent child actor's life.
ImageImageImageImage

wwry
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6557
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 22:36:19
Location: bucky hacked me

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby Gimpy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 19:13:55

TenuredVulture wrote:You know, I wonder if you got rid of all the stuff people don't like about the prequels--Jar jar, the long ass pod race, the impossible to follow political maneuvering, and so forth, and just focused on how Anakin became Darth Vader and how he betrayed the Jedi--would you have one really strong movie?


Not with what's already been done because the directing and writing was still godawful. Is there story there to make a good movie? Sure, but it didn't land on the screen.

Gimpy
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 15670
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 19:11:47

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby Gimpy » Sat Jan 16, 2016 19:14:48

If Darth Jar Jar ended up panning out, it would have made the original trilogy watchable.

Gimpy
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 15670
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 19:11:47

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby RichmondPhilsFan » Tue Jan 19, 2016 17:13:02

bleh wrote:You think it's absurd that those ep IV ideas were original? The idea that they aren't original is absurd. And there were dozens of other original characters and stuff in there. And my point with the ep I ideas is that being original doesn't really matter if the ideas suck.

No, I think it's absurd that you're boiling down the original ideas of the prequels to midichlorians and Jar Jar Binks* just because you happen to hate those. They're the obvious whipping boys of prequel haters. (It's also ironically unoriginal, but whatever.)

It's fair to criticize the execution of those films--I'll agree to disagree somewhat on that point--and especially target certain dialogue. But the ideas of the PT are quite expansive.

For the record, the argument of originality as it pertains to Star Wars is bizarre. The films were originally conceived as a throwback to the Flash Gordon/John Carter/pulp serials of Lucas's childhood. Criticizing Ep VII for being "unoriginal" when it presents new characters and storylines by couching them in the comfort of familiar conceits and devices--especially in a climate where the popular consensus is that the new trilogy needs to "redeem" SW after the prequels--is completely missing the point.



*Jar Jar Binks is probably the least original aspect of the prequels, even if the character is unfairly maligned IMO. He's not even original in the SW universe. He's an amalgamation of the Ewoks and C-3PO--the message of "even the seemingly insignificant creature can have a massive impact on civilization" combined with the awkward dialogue and pratfall comedy--albeit with weaker execution.
Last edited by RichmondPhilsFan on Tue Jan 19, 2016 17:18:42, edited 1 time in total.

RichmondPhilsFan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9738
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:49:07
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby RichmondPhilsFan » Tue Jan 19, 2016 17:17:37

TenuredVulture wrote:You know, I wonder if you got rid of all the stuff people don't like about the prequels--Jar jar, the long ass pod race, the impossible to follow political maneuvering, and so forth, and just focused on how Anakin became Darth Vader and how he betrayed the Jedi--would you have one really strong movie?

If that's all you're interested in, sure. But then you miss the machinations of Sidious and the slow descent from a Republic into an Empire, which are brilliant stories. If you watch all three prequels and all six seasons of the Clone Wars, the scope of the story is captivating.

I just rewatched the final four episodes of Clone Wars S5 last night. The hybrid Republic/Imperial imagery combined with Ahsoka's storyline is so well done.

RichmondPhilsFan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9738
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:49:07
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby Bill McNeal » Tue Jan 19, 2016 19:28:15

Yeah, my son has been rewarching the close wars and over the weekend he watched the Ahsoka storyline where she is framed for murder. It was really entertaining.
man I drew all these penises for nothing - housh

Bill McNeal
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 27673
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 21:05:24
Location: A Place To Be Somebody

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby stevelxa476 » Wed Jan 20, 2016 19:43:24

Not a big deal, but Ep VIII has been moved from May 2017 to December 2017.
Yes son. I'm the best mono-thingy guy there ever was.

stevelxa476
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 8234
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:32:37
Location: The Legit Republic of Blanketsburg

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby CalvinBall » Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:23:26

it is a big deal for speilberg and cameron, who had ready player one and avatar 2 slated to come out that same day.

CalvinBall
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 64951
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 15:30:02
Location: Pigslyvania

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby RichmondPhilsFan » Thu Jan 21, 2016 13:16:09

CalvinBall wrote:it is a big deal for speilberg and cameron, who had ready player one and avatar 2 slated to come out that same day.


Would love to catch a Ready Player One/Ep VIII double feature. Too perfect.

RichmondPhilsFan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9738
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:49:07
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby SideshowBob » Fri Feb 19, 2016 16:45:00

"[In the] effort to protect innocent children, the fair treatment of adults should not become a collateral casualty"

-Dr. Fred Berlin, founder of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic

SideshowBob
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 3121
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 23:00:10

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby pacino » Mon Mar 07, 2016 00:15:52

thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby SideshowBob » Mon Mar 07, 2016 23:15:01

"[In the] effort to protect innocent children, the fair treatment of adults should not become a collateral casualty"

-Dr. Fred Berlin, founder of the Johns Hopkins Sexual Disorders Clinic

SideshowBob
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 3121
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 23:00:10

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby RichmondPhilsFan » Wed Mar 30, 2016 22:05:33

Holy shit.

Any of you who aren't watching Star Wars Rebels...

The S2 finale was tonight. Just... Holy shit.

RichmondPhilsFan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 9738
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:49:07
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby Wolfgang622 » Wed Mar 30, 2016 22:54:47



Now that Star Wars is divorced from the creative vision / impetus of one particular person, I am quite certain they will keep releasing Star Wars movies until people stop buying tickets. That is, there is no practical limit on the number of Star Wars movies we can now expect.

Which is a shame, really.
Last edited by Wolfgang622 on Wed Mar 30, 2016 22:58:22, edited 2 times in total.
"I'm in a bar with the games sound turned off and that Cespedes home run still sounded like inevitability."

-swish

Wolfgang622
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28653
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 23:11:51
Location: Baseball Heaven

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby Wolfgang622 » Wed Mar 30, 2016 22:56:37

This picture...

I really, really hate JJ Abrams, probably to an unreasonable degree.

Image
"I'm in a bar with the games sound turned off and that Cespedes home run still sounded like inevitability."

-swish

Wolfgang622
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28653
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 23:11:51
Location: Baseball Heaven

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby JUburton » Thu Mar 31, 2016 07:30:03

mozartpc27 wrote:


Now that Star Wars is divorced from the creative vision / impetus of one particular person, I am quite certain they will keep releasing Star Wars movies until people stop buying tickets. That is, there is no practical limit on the number of Star Wars movies we can now expect.

Which is a shame, really.
I don't get this stance. First, new installments can't ruin the old ones. The prequels basically prove that. The first trilogy is still great despite the second! Now JJ comes in and makes Star Wars fun again and there could be more new good fun ones! Star Wars is ruined! I wish luke skywalker never existed!

JUburton
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 17132
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 20:49:25
Location: Philly

Re: Star Wars (now owned by Disney) - NO SPOILERS

Postby pacino » Thu Mar 31, 2016 07:52:09

mozartpc27 wrote:


Now that Star Wars is divorced from the creative vision / impetus of one particular person, I am quite certain they will keep releasing Star Wars movies until people stop buying tickets. That is, there is no practical limit on the number of Star Wars movies we can now expect.

Which is a shame, really.

I'm fine with it!
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

PreviousNext