Halladay XII: Now with Roy Halladay!

Postby cartersDad26 » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:27:16

Let's wait for this to shake out. I think Rube is going to surprise us - I have faith in the smug.

cartersDad26
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 28730
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 19:15:07

Postby uncle milt » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:28:56

so we get possibly the best pitcher in baseball, for a below-market value contract, which allows him to be with jimmy/chase/popo/wertz/choochtober/vic through their being as old as derek jeter is now, and i'm supposed to be sad? i don't want to go there.

uncle milt
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6205
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 15:54:36

Postby Trent Steele » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:31:32

Stark sYs we are getting ms top two pitching prospects back
I know what you're asking yourself and the answer is yes. I have a nick name for my penis. Its called the Octagon, but I also nick named my testes - my left one is James Westfall and my right one is Doctor Kenneth Noisewater.

Trent Steele
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 43508
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 15:02:27
Location: flapjacks

Postby The Savior » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:32:25

Can we have Morrow, please?

The Savior
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 30452
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 09:53:42

Postby Bakestar » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:32:26

ek wrote:stark says we are getting the top 2 pitching prospect in seattle's organization plus an OF that is equivalent to Taylor


Gillies = Taylor? Not buying that.
Foreskin stupid

Bakestar
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 14709
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 17:57:53
Location: Crane Jackson's Fountain Street Theatre

Postby jerseyhoya » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:33:31

ek wrote:stark says we are getting the top 2 pitching prospect in seattle's organization plus an OF that is equivalent to Taylor


Then why not trade them to Toronto and keep our own prospects

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Postby HillMD » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:34:13

Top two pitching prospects are supposed to be Ramirez and Aumont. I guess. That's the deal. I do think Gillies is going to be a solid leadoff man.

HillMD
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6609
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 20:18:10

Postby dajafi » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:36:23

So here's something else that doesn't make sense:

supposedly the whole reason Seattle got involved was because they had prospects that Toronto wanted. The two Ms farmhands we keep hearing about, Aumont and Gillies, are Canadians. Anthopoulos reportedly wants Canadian players. Why then would the Phils make a bad trade to dump Lee for Canadian prospects if not to package them for the Jays?

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Postby Bakestar » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:37:50

Image

Tyson and Phillippe
Foreskin stupid

Bakestar
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 14709
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 17:57:53
Location: Crane Jackson's Fountain Street Theatre

Postby Gomes » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:37:57

I am definitely not knowledgeable about Mariners minor league prospects - but what is special about Juan Ramirez? Not a particularly impressive strikeout rate, and he got rocked a bit in high A.

Gomes
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:34:42
Location: West Chester, PA

Postby PSUPhilliesPhan » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:38:09

HillMD wrote:Top two pitching prospects are supposed to be Ramirez and Aumont. I guess. That's the deal. I do think Gillies is going to be a solid leadoff man.


I mean dude was only 20 this year and hit .341 in high A with 44 sb's and a 916 ops

PSUPhilliesPhan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6135
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 18:27:32
Location: South Philly by a block

Postby PSUPhilliesPhan » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:40:14

dajafi wrote:So here's something else that doesn't make sense:

supposedly the whole reason Seattle got involved was because they had prospects that Toronto wanted. The two Ms farmhands we keep hearing about, Aumont and Gillies, are Canadians. Anthopoulos reportedly wants Canadian players. Why then would the Phils make a bad trade to dump Lee for Canadian prospects if not to package them for the Jays?


This is what is bothering me too. If none of the M's prospects are going to Toronto then I would be on the phone with Texas right now, they are loaded.

PSUPhilliesPhan
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6135
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 18:27:32
Location: South Philly by a block

Postby jerseyhoya » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:40:51

dajafi wrote:So here's something else that doesn't make sense:

supposedly the whole reason Seattle got involved was because they had prospects that Toronto wanted. The two Ms farmhands we keep hearing about, Aumont and Gillies, are Canadians. Anthopoulos reportedly wants Canadian players. Why then would the Phils make a bad trade to dump Lee for Canadian prospects if not to package them for the Jays?


I'm still waiting for the "Oh, now that makes sense" moment too

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Postby The Savior » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:46:51

Until traded, I still don't believe that Drabek is going anywhere. Yesterday, all we heard was that Aumont was off-the-table. Now, he's apparently in the deal. His presence makes zero sense if Drabek is involved.

Rube is clearly trying to get Halladay without trading away the farm and staying within the budget.

The "twist" may be that by including Drabek, Rube can get Toronto to throw in $5-7m in cash for this year. Combine that with say a renegotiated 2010 salary for Halladay and perhaps this is Rube's way of creating some space in his budget to get a backend of the bullpen pitcher.

The Savior
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 30452
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 09:53:42

Postby Squire » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:46:55

I think the whole notion that the Canadian team wants Canadian players is overblown. I think that is something that sportswriters speculate about.

Squire
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 11747
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 16:50:35

Postby bleh » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:47:20

If Seattle's not sending anything to Toronto, then just get rid of Blanton somehow, trade him for nothing and keep Lee.
Last edited by bleh on Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:47:34, edited 1 time in total.

bleh
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 10603
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 14:06:21

Postby Grotewold » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:47:30

PSUPhilliesPhan wrote:
dajafi wrote:So here's something else that doesn't make sense:

supposedly the whole reason Seattle got involved was because they had prospects that Toronto wanted. The two Ms farmhands we keep hearing about, Aumont and Gillies, are Canadians. Anthopoulos reportedly wants Canadian players. Why then would the Phils make a bad trade to dump Lee for Canadian prospects if not to package them for the Jays?


This is what is bothering me too. If none of the M's prospects are going to Toronto then I would be on the phone with Texas right now, they are loaded.


Are you assuming that didn't cross Amaro's mind?

He either likes the M's prospects or there's something we don't know.

Grotewold
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 51642
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 09:40:10

Postby Gomes » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:49:27

bleh wrote:If Seattle's not sending anything to Toronto, then just get rid of Blanton somehow, trade him for nothing and keep Lee.


Or we could have just non-tendered Blanton, if Rube knew this deal was in the works.

Gomes
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 10:34:42
Location: West Chester, PA

Postby kimbatiste » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:49:48

The Savior wrote:Until traded, I still don't believe that Drabek is going anywhere. Yesterday, all we heard was that Aumont was off-the-table. Now, he's apparently in the deal. His presence makes zero sense if Drabek is involved.

Rube is clearly trying to get Halladay without trading away the farm and staying within the budget.

The "twist" may be that by including Drabek, Rube can get Toronto to throw in $5-7m in cash for this year. Combine that with say a renegotiated 2010 salary for Halladay and perhaps this is Rube's way of creating some space in his budget to get a backend of the bullpen pitcher.


We sell out every game and sells gobs of merchandise. We shouldn't essentially be selling our top prospect for $6 million.

kimbatiste
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 23:32:27

Postby HillMD » Tue Dec 15, 2009 09:51:45

dajafi wrote:So here's something else that doesn't make sense:

supposedly the whole reason Seattle got involved was because they had prospects that Toronto wanted. The two Ms farmhands we keep hearing about, Aumont and Gillies, are Canadians. Anthopoulos reportedly wants Canadian players. Why then would the Phils make a bad trade to dump Lee for Canadian prospects if not to package them for the Jays?

I was thinking something along these lines: Amaro initially thought he was just going to give up Lee. Anthopolous agreed to it at first, receiving these Canadian prospects. Halladay and his agent flew to Philadelphia, Amaro is ecstatic that the love of his life is going to be a Phillie. Anthopolous calls and turns Amaro's world upside down. He says "We don't want to do this anymore. We're not getting enough. Seriously. I don't care, I'll keep him unless you give me your prospects instead of Seattle's." Amaro, in the midst of negotiating a contract with Halladay, begins to panic and absolutely has to make the deal work now that he is so immersed into everything and doesn't want to tell Roy and his agent that there's no deal after all. He agrees to give Toronto the prospects they wanted all along, and ends up having to take the prospects that were supposed to go to the Blue Jays in an effort to somehow avoid depleting the entire system.

HillMD
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 6609
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 20:18:10

PreviousNext