kenrosenthal wrote:heyman has an update on si.com, but nothing is new
same crap over and over again
kopphanatic wrote:So is Gordon Gekko wrong then?
S2D wrote:FTN wrote:And really, I could definitely see this coming from Toronto's end, because...
Drabek and Buchholz are similar. Buchholz is a legit #1/2 SP, he's had some success in the big leagues, and has dominated at AAA this year. Like Drabek, he has a few red flags. He doesn't pitch effectively off his fastball and relies too heavily on his secondary pitches, and he was arrested for stealing computers from a school. Drabek is younger, but has an arm surgery on his docket and had maturity issues in high school, same as Buchholz.
Westmoreland is a lot like Brown. Hes a 5 tool athlete, hes got mega projection, etc etc.
Bowden and Happ are similar, both have deceptive deliveries, though I think Happ is actually a better bet going forward after seeing Bowden with my own eyes. His delivery is just whacked.
In a way, this makes perfect sense from Toronto's side to float this. The three pieces have similar profiles, almost scary how similar they are. So its like "Hey Philly, Boston is willing to give us a very similar package, what do you say?"
It certainly doesn't look like a deal with that "Premium" for AL East teams that Ricciardi was talking about. Heyman reported that douche bag asked the Yankees for both Hughes and Joba just to start the deal.
bleh wrote:stevemc wrote:as an aside - the last Halladay thread closed out at 50 pages in 42 hours. I'd give this one 34 hours. So my guess is about 11PM tomorrow night.
time to start discussing what to name the next one
JFLNYC wrote:It's a premium over what the Phils offered because they wouldn't take the deal offered to them by JPR. That's why you don't dick around if there's an asset you want. Everybody assumed that, by waiting, Rube would get the price down. But, as I feared, the price can also go up if someone swoops in and agrees to pay the asking price and the closer you get to the deadline, the greater the chance it can happen.
BIGPHILLY wrote:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/baseball/mlb/07/28/bluejays.finance.ap/index.html
* States that Toronto ownership needs to cut costs.
Here's a paradigm buster. Phillies are selling out every single night. Why not take on Halladay and give them the deal you want - but offer like $10,000,00 in cash kicked in as well.
So you could go:
Drabek, Taylor, Donald and $10,000,000 and call it a day.
You think in this economy taking Halladay's salary off the books and kicking in $10 million is not enticing?
JFLNYC wrote:The Dude wrote:The price didn't go up yet, this is likely posturing
Unless it's not.
JFLNYC wrote:Unless it's not.
Mike in Midlothian wrote:bleh wrote:stevemc wrote:as an aside - the last Halladay thread closed out at 50 pages in 42 hours. I'd give this one 34 hours. So my guess is about 11PM tomorrow night.
time to start discussing what to name the next one
Halladay: Eight is Enoughz
FTN wrote:BIGPHILLY wrote:http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/baseball/mlb/07/28/bluejays.finance.ap/index.html
* States that Toronto ownership needs to cut costs.
Here's a paradigm buster. Phillies are selling out every single night. Why not take on Halladay and give them the deal you want - but offer like $10,000,00 in cash kicked in as well.
So you could go:
Drabek, Taylor, Donald and $10,000,000 and call it a day.
You think in this economy taking Halladay's salary off the books and kicking in $10 million is not enticing?
You can't do that. Commish doesn't allow piles of cash to go to a team, any money sent has to coincide with paying for a newly acquired player's salary