phorever wrote:Uncle Milty wrote:phorever wrote:serious question: is there any successful 2019-20 phillies offseason that doesn't include signing gerrit cole?
Sure, but the aggregate of moves need to about equal signing him. Plenty of opportunity to do that since we can pencil in only 3 or 4 above average contributors right now.
the problem is that there were only about 30 position players worth 4.5 or more wins in 2019, very few of which are free-agents, and if you want 7 wins from replacing 1.5 - 2.5 win players (segura, kingery, hoskins, hernandez, haseley+bruce) with anyone other than rendon, you most likely are going to need to make 3 such moves. and the phils would need to add the equivalent of the full value of g.cole and rendon combined to be real contenders in 2020.
since the phils had two rotation spots worth under 1.0 fwar in 2019, the best alternative to signing cole is signing two (or three?) of the next tier of fa pitchers: ryu, odorizzi, wheeler, madbum, ... however, all of those have much worse risk/reward ratios than cole, and all of them would leave the phils relying on nola to rebound so that he can fill the role of a true ace that is pretty much a prerequisite for perennial contention.
i've got to say, i'm completely in favor of middleton reminding his management team that the phils aren't a small market team and shouldn't be afraid to blow by the luxury tax limit for one season in order to complement recent and future farm system successes (nola, realmuto via sixto, bohm and s.howard, maybe kingery and hasely and some of the pen guys) with premium fa's. moving on from a first-time manager still experiencing growing pains to a top-shelf manager like girardi to make those premium fa's more comfortable isn't a bad idea. nor is sticking with a gm who landed realmuto and cutch (and segura, whom i think most here are underrating based on an off-year) and several surprisingly effective midseason emergency replacements while staying out of last year's suspect fa pitching market in favor of a much better selection this offseason. middleton's current approach seems exactly right for an organization that still tends to default to thinking like a small-market team.
(sorry for the rant... but the new "meddleton" label is starting to annoy me. i had far too many decades of suffering under financially conservative ownership and analytics luddites throughout the management to put up with people slamming the guy whose "meddling" resulted in what is looking more and more like a win of the harper-manny stare-down last year, and who assembled a front office that finally brought the phils out of dark ages w.r.t. analytics and has at least as many big successes as big failures in its track record)
Didn't come across as a rant to me. As for "meddleton" my use of it is purely as a joke. Not sure where I posted it but I much prefer this version of ownership compared to the days fans complained about cheap, invisible owners. Then again I'm one of the few who didn't see much wrong in the press conference.
Back to the original question. For me part of it is that I wouldn't count Cole as a 7 win player in 2020 and part of it is substituting position player WAR for pitcher WAR equally.
The determination for me is which provides the most overall improvement in 2020: Greatly increase the likelihood of winning in 32 Cole starts. Increase your chances in 65 MadBum/Pineda starts. Lesser increase in 300 Rendon/Starling Marte starts.