Bucky wrote:what would happen if he faced that nats refliefer guy
pacino wrote:0-17 with 11ks and 4 walks
it's pretty sad
pacino wrote:0-17 with 11ks and 4 walks
it's pretty sad
MoBettle wrote:The Marlins are averaging under 10K people attending home games, would that be a record?
Also I was looking at attendance numbers on ESPN, and I noticed that the A's were 21st at 23k a game, which of course is bad but good for them. But then I looked into it further and that includes their Japan games against the Mariners which were 43+k sellout "home" games. In their actual home games they are averaging ~17k, which includes a series against the Red Sox of all teams where they averaged about 14k.
Some of the attendance numbers are really jarring/scary for some of these teams. Like in 2012 no one averaged under 19k people. Right now even buoyed by opening weekends there are 5 teams under that number, and that doesn't include the A's who will surely join them.
I imagine this isn't a new thought or anything but I just don't get how these teams come close to breaking even with gate numbers that bad.
Trent Steele wrote:MoBettle wrote:The Marlins are averaging under 10K people attending home games, would that be a record?
Also I was looking at attendance numbers on ESPN, and I noticed that the A's were 21st at 23k a game, which of course is bad but good for them. But then I looked into it further and that includes their Japan games against the Mariners which were 43+k sellout "home" games. In their actual home games they are averaging ~17k, which includes a series against the Red Sox of all teams where they averaged about 14k.
Some of the attendance numbers are really jarring/scary for some of these teams. Like in 2012 no one averaged under 19k people. Right now even buoyed by opening weekends there are 5 teams under that number, and that doesn't include the A's who will surely join them.
I imagine this isn't a new thought or anything but I just don't get how these teams come close to breaking even with gate numbers that bad.
It's the changing economics of the game. Gate revenue now makes up less than 30 percent of total revenues leaguewide.
Trent Steele wrote:MoBettle wrote:The Marlins are averaging under 10K people attending home games, would that be a record?
Also I was looking at attendance numbers on ESPN, and I noticed that the A's were 21st at 23k a game, which of course is bad but good for them. But then I looked into it further and that includes their Japan games against the Mariners which were 43+k sellout "home" games. In their actual home games they are averaging ~17k, which includes a series against the Red Sox of all teams where they averaged about 14k.
Some of the attendance numbers are really jarring/scary for some of these teams. Like in 2012 no one averaged under 19k people. Right now even buoyed by opening weekends there are 5 teams under that number, and that doesn't include the A's who will surely join them.
I imagine this isn't a new thought or anything but I just don't get how these teams come close to breaking even with gate numbers that bad.
It's the changing economics of the game. Gate revenue now makes up less than 30 percent of total revenues leaguewide.
MoBettle wrote:Trent Steele wrote:MoBettle wrote:The Marlins are averaging under 10K people attending home games, would that be a record?
Also I was looking at attendance numbers on ESPN, and I noticed that the A's were 21st at 23k a game, which of course is bad but good for them. But then I looked into it further and that includes their Japan games against the Mariners which were 43+k sellout "home" games. In their actual home games they are averaging ~17k, which includes a series against the Red Sox of all teams where they averaged about 14k.
Some of the attendance numbers are really jarring/scary for some of these teams. Like in 2012 no one averaged under 19k people. Right now even buoyed by opening weekends there are 5 teams under that number, and that doesn't include the A's who will surely join them.
I imagine this isn't a new thought or anything but I just don't get how these teams come close to breaking even with gate numbers that bad.
It's the changing economics of the game. Gate revenue now makes up less than 30 percent of total revenues leaguewide.
I know that was true for the NFL and NBA, but was under the impression that baseball is still pretty dependent on gate? Admittedly I haven't looked into it in a few years and that has probably changed with all of the big RSN deals. Still though, I feel like these teams that can't draw anyone would also run into issues there? Are they really just living off of revenue sharing? This isn't like basketball or football, there's comparatively few national games, people generally don't watch games where their teams aren't playing ect.
BALTIMORE -- Orioles first baseman Chris Davis is nearing a record streak for futility.
Davis was 0-for-4 with two strikeouts in Sunday's 15-3 loss to the New York Yankees. He is 0-for-23 with 13 strikeouts this season and is hitless in 44 at-bats since a second-inning double off James Shields of the Chicago White Sox last Sept. 14.
Davis is two shy of the record for consecutive hitless at-bats by a position player, according to the Elias Sports Bureau. Los Angeles Dodgers infielder Eugenio Velez went hitless in his final 46 at-bats of the 2011 season, one more than the previous mark shared by Pittsburgh's Bill Bergen (1909), Dave Campbell of San Diego and St. Louis (1973) and Milwaukee's Craig Counsell (earlier in 2011).
bleh wrote:They're wrong about Eugenio Velez. He was 0 for 37 for the whole year in 2011. His streak stretched back to 2010: https://www.baseball-reference.com/play ... eu01.shtml
wiivile wrote:https://www.philly.com/sports/trump-cancels-mlb-baseball-cuba-deal-20190408.html
What does Trump have to do with baseball? Why does MLB care about Trump?
stevelxa476 wrote:wiivile wrote:https://www.philly.com/sports/trump-cancels-mlb-baseball-cuba-deal-20190408.html
What does Trump have to do with baseball? Why does MLB care about Trump?
Immigants comin to steal are jerbs.