by The Nightman Cometh » Mon Oct 27, 2014 18:52:38
TenuredVulture wrote:Here's a happy thought--maybe Chip isn't good at evaluating NFL QBs. Consider--Barkley, Sanchez, Foles. (Yes, I know Reid drafted Foles. But Chip made him the starter with no real plan B.)
by The Nightman Cometh » Mon Oct 27, 2014 18:53:36
Trent Steele wrote:My eyes tell me Cooper is fucking horrible.
Pro Football Focus tells me that he is 62nd out of 62 WRs that play at least 60% of his team's snaps. And that he's only that high because he grades out positively on blocking.
So yeah, he's a disaster.
by Woody » Mon Oct 27, 2014 19:42:34
The Nightman Cometh wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Here's a happy thought--maybe Chip isn't good at evaluating NFL QBs. Consider--Barkley, Sanchez, Foles. (Yes, I know Reid drafted Foles. But Chip made him the starter with no real plan B.)
Matt Barkley is a fourth round pick who looks like a serviceable backup. That's not a miss at all.
by heyeaglefn » Mon Oct 27, 2014 19:52:55
The Nightman Cometh wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Here's a happy thought--maybe Chip isn't good at evaluating NFL QBs. Consider--Barkley, Sanchez, Foles. (Yes, I know Reid drafted Foles. But Chip made him the starter with no real plan B.)
Matt Barkley is a fourth round pick who looks like a serviceable backup. That's not a miss at all.
by The Nightman Cometh » Mon Oct 27, 2014 19:54:57
heyeaglefn wrote:The Nightman Cometh wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Here's a happy thought--maybe Chip isn't good at evaluating NFL QBs. Consider--Barkley, Sanchez, Foles. (Yes, I know Reid drafted Foles. But Chip made him the starter with no real plan B.)
Matt Barkley is a fourth round pick who looks like a serviceable backup. That's not a miss at all.
Not sure he has proven he is a serviceable backup.
3 games played, 0 TDs, 4 INTS, QBR of 19.5
He very well could be a good backup, but hasn't proven that at all.
by jerseyhoya » Mon Oct 27, 2014 19:58:00
by td11 » Mon Oct 27, 2014 20:34:21
jerseyhoya wrote:I'm just happy TNC called Eli a good quarterback today
by Napalm » Mon Oct 27, 2014 20:44:47
Napalm wrote:foles have good chemistry with 4th stringers and celek
Napalm wrote:look, foles sucks. lets be real about it
Napalm wrote:go away foles
and take kirk coleman with you
by Rockinghorse » Mon Oct 27, 2014 20:49:53
by Napalm » Mon Oct 27, 2014 20:52:09
Rockinghorse wrote:If he went away when you asked, we wouldn't have won all those games last year.
...and had a better draft pick
...and easier schedule right now
Napalm wrote:if it seems like i'm rooting against him, its because i dont want the nick foles experiment to take itself into next year. he's nothing special. I've acknowledged in the gdts the nice throws he makes during the game, but through 4 games, I havent seen anything that wows me. The throw to avant down at the 1 was great. Eli and Carson also threw 50+ times too, in palmers case, 60+, and in Elis case, the giants were down big in the 2nd half, and eli put up 500 yards.
He just looks average to me, whats wrong with thinking that? I've already said why he didnt look that good today, and in other games, and in his physical attributes, and i've acknowledged what he does good, and when he has done those things good. I'm done with this rah-rah shit, i dont like people playin on my phone
by Napalm » Mon Oct 27, 2014 20:53:58
by slugsrbad » Mon Oct 27, 2014 21:32:33
Doll Is Mine wrote:This Ellen DeGeneres look alike on ESPN is annoying. Who the hell is he?
by Stripes » Mon Oct 27, 2014 21:51:57
TenuredVulture wrote:How many starting QBs are 3rd round picks?
by heyeaglefn » Tue Oct 28, 2014 08:13:24
The Nightman Cometh wrote:heyeaglefn wrote:The Nightman Cometh wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Here's a happy thought--maybe Chip isn't good at evaluating NFL QBs. Consider--Barkley, Sanchez, Foles. (Yes, I know Reid drafted Foles. But Chip made him the starter with no real plan B.)
Matt Barkley is a fourth round pick who looks like a serviceable backup. That's not a miss at all.
Not sure he has proven he is a serviceable backup.
3 games played, 0 TDs, 4 INTS, QBR of 19.5
He very well could be a good backup, but hasn't proven that at all.
Well it's a good thing I didn't say that at all then, isn't it?
by Wheels Tupay » Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:51:39
by Soren » Tue Oct 28, 2014 12:14:56
td11 wrote:WheelsFellOff wrote:Eem wrote:ek wrote:they aren't a SB contender because they don't have a good enough secondary.
This, frankly, is BS.
They blew coverage on Brown but had been good for most of the game. Floyd didn't catch a pass, outside of Fitz's long TD on a perfectly executed pick play he was held in reasonable check. They're not great, but they're more than good enough to win if the offense doesn't blow in the red zone.
Definitely. They left at least 14 points on the field. The Huff fumble I can overlook for now, lots of rookie WR's have issues securing the ball. The Cromartie INT was inexcusable though and 100% on Foles.
both INTs were horrendous
by Trent Steele » Tue Nov 11, 2014 00:09:52
