mcare89 wrote:

Gimpy wrote:I don't even like 3 and 32 for 1.

I'd do that. It's nice to draw a line in the sand, but when it comes down to it, if you think Wiggins is a franchise guy, you do it.

3, 10 and 32 is a different story because at that point, you're trading enough assets that you could develop into acquiring a proven superstar. That could be Exum, Saric, and whoever falls to 32. That's a lot to give up for, as much as I love Wiggins, an unproven commodity.

mcare89 wrote:

Gimpy wrote:I don't even like 3 and 32 for 1.

I'd do that. It's nice to draw a line in the sand, but when it comes down to it, if you think Wiggins is a franchise guy, you do it.

3, 10 and 32 is a different story because at that point, you're trading enough assets that you could develop into acquiring a proven superstar. That could be Exum, Saric, and whoever falls to 32. That's a lot to give up for, as much as I love Wiggins, an unproven commodity.

Ace Rothstein wrote:3 and 32 for 1 would be a steal, i couldnt imagine the cavs being that dumb

mcare89 wrote:

The Savior wrote:we better we getting waiters in that bullshit deal

Not interested in Waiters, but I'd take Bennett.

Gimpy wrote:I dunno, I think there's going to be a good player at 32 and I like multiple guys that'll be there at 3. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

PSUPhilliesPhan wrote:Ughhhh Goodman just mocked Randle to us at #3. Said he's hearing he's in play if we keep it.

Eddie Jordan wrote:I don't know if they've given up on Bennett that quickly is the problem. Hard to admit a mistake (if he does indeed suck). Now Waiters I could see them cutting ties with because he has issues with Irving supposedly