Squire wrote:The ending of the game is a little weird because with 9 seconds remaining you really wouldn't be certain that it was the last play of the game. So you had the relief of seeing the ball hit the ground which then got multiplied when your eyes found the clock.
Squire wrote:The ending of the game is a little weird because with 9 seconds remaining you really wouldn't be certain that it was the last play of the game. So you had the relief of seeing the ball hit the ground which then got multiplied when your eyes found the clock.
Squire wrote:The ending of the game is a little weird because with 9 seconds remaining you really wouldn't be certain that it was the last play of the game. So you had the relief of seeing the ball hit the ground which then got multiplied when your eyes found the clock.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Bill McNeal wrote:Squire wrote:The ending of the game is a little weird because with 9 seconds remaining you really wouldn't be certain that it was the last play of the game. So you had the relief of seeing the ball hit the ground which then got multiplied when your eyes found the clock.
I was standing in my living room after that and after going nuts all game I just stood there for like 5 seconds. My wife said to me, "they just won the super bowl, what are you doing?!" I was just waiting for a flag or the officials to say they were adding a second to the clock or something like that. It just didn't seem real. Then I went nuts.
wiivile wrote:The Clement TD was more questionable than the Ertz TD. The "runner" thing was clear on Ertz. Not sure what decided the Clement TD review.
ReadingPhilly wrote: