pacino wrote:

some of the high-flying assets

Woody wrote:high-flying assets?

td11 wrote:a man who still believes the central park 5 should've been executed now has control of DOJ

Woody wrote:high-flying assets?

RichmondPhilsFan wrote:

Woody wrote:high-flying assets?

Probably referring to the highly classified super advanced robot spaceships that we have in orbit that he just learned about yesterday in his first high-level intelligence briefing.

pacino wrote:we shouldn't even have electors

i would not be for them not voting for who their state chose, however.

I hope I'm wrong, but I believe that he is a fraud, and I think despite all of his rhetoric about being a champion of the working class, it will turn out to be hollow

td11 wrote:bernie today:

I hope I'm wrong, but I believe that he is a fraud, and I think despite all of his rhetoric about being a champion of the working class, it will turn out to be hollow

i'm gonna be a socialist now

thephan wrote:
Some have indicated that scrapping the EC, and working the simple math of winner takes-all is great (it would have only changed how badly the beating was), while others suggest that some type of state wide splits could be calculated (potentially allowing the middle of a state like PA to really change the complexion of what its vote looks like), making the calculation harder (while providing more candidate money to local concerns the working election system).

td11 wrote:have any other democrats made statements that are not some version of "i will work with him....... for the country"

“When President-elect Trump wants to take on these issues, when his goal is to increase the economic security of middle class families, then count me in,” she said.

But she pledged to fight him on his signature campaign issues — deporting people in the U.S. illegally, cutting taxes for the wealthy, repealing President Barack Obama’s health-care law, and rolling back regulations of the financial industry.

And she promised to push back if Mr. Trump continues to use the divisive rhetoric of his campaign attacking groups like immigrants and Muslims.

“That marks Democrats’ first job in this era: We will stand up to bigotry,” she said.

td11 wrote:have any other democrats made statements that are not some version of "i will work with him....... for the country"

It is a rare privilege to play a part in shaping the future of a great nation. By offering Americans an honorable, principled choice in this election, and being joined by thousands of supporters and volunteers to make a credible third party ticket part of the national conversation, we took significant steps toward reshaping the political landscape. For that, I am both proud and grateful.

This campaign was not about Bill Weld and me. It was not even about 2016. It was about a small government, greater freedom movement that I am confident will take hold and grow well beyond this election. It was about showing millennials, young people and all Americans that they do not have to blindly accept a two party duopoly. We have hopefully set the stage for that movement to flourish and have real success at the polls.

This is a great nation filled with great people. Bill Weld and I are honored to have provided a voice for millions of those great people, and deeply grateful to all those who made this historic effort possible.

Today is a day to wish the President-elect our best wishes, and a sincere hope that, together, we can get about the business of addressing the challenges this great nation faces.

CalvinBall wrote:

td11 wrote:can't wait to read profiles/stories about how great of a family man trump is and what a decent american he is

it's going to be infuriating to watch democrats bend over backwards to work with the trump admin "for the good of the country" after the GOP did nothing but obstruct obama for 8 years. at the very least conservatives should be able to admit to themselves now that the GOP obstructionism of the last 8 years was driven largely by racist sentiment, the same sentiment that culminated in a trump presidency

this is already making me so mad. block them. fuck these assholes.

trumps wants to have an infrastructure bill! Dems have tried for years and years. Republicans said no no no! I am sure though the people who voted for him know that though!

Werthless wrote:

CalvinBall wrote:

td11 wrote:can't wait to read profiles/stories about how great of a family man trump is and what a decent american he is

it's going to be infuriating to watch democrats bend over backwards to work with the trump admin "for the good of the country" after the GOP did nothing but obstruct obama for 8 years. at the very least conservatives should be able to admit to themselves now that the GOP obstructionism of the last 8 years was driven largely by racist sentiment, the same sentiment that culminated in a trump presidency

this is already making me so mad. block them. #$!&@ these asshat.

trumps wants to have an infrastructure bill! Dems have tried for years and years. Republicans said no no no! I am sure though the people who voted for him know that though!

What if Trump pushes through bills that give liberals what they wanted all along? Infrastructure bills is a phenomenal example. We already know his political leanings are all over the place, and he's not a traditional conservative. Do they, and should they, oppose him because he is a sexual assaulter?? I have a hard time getting behind that, and I hate Trump.

Plus, it gives them credibility to oppose all the lousy stuff that will inevitably get passed.

Doll Is Mine wrote:It's embarrassing how much Paul Ryan is kissing Trump's ass.

He's going to be one of the first ones that Trump screws.