thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Soren wrote:latter is good for me I guess
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
drsmooth wrote:can someone remind me the exact date when the drumpf university fraud case takes over our front pages between now and inauguration day?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:November 28th
pacino wrote:coal surging, pharma surging
Gimpy wrote:pacino wrote:coal surging, pharma surging
Surprising that pharma is doing well after the marijuana wins yesterday
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Gimpy wrote:pacino wrote:coal surging, pharma surging
Surprising that pharma is doing well after the marijuana wins yesterday
JFLNYC wrote:Gimpy wrote:pacino wrote:coal surging, pharma surging
Surprising that pharma is doing well after the marijuana wins yesterday
How long do you think it will be before big pharma starts rolling up all the medicinal marijuana production and distribution?
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Gimpy wrote:Does anyone else kind of like the way Nebraska and Maine dole out their electoral votes?
I think it'd make a lot more sense if every state gave a candidate 2 votes for the popular win and then have every congressional district within the state be worth another vote. I'm not a fan of the winner take all thing.
Ideally, first past the post should be eliminated, but that'll never happen because it would threaten to take power from the two parties in charge.
Gimpy wrote:Does anyone else kind of like the way Nebraska and Maine dole out their electoral votes?
I think it'd make a lot more sense if every state gave a candidate 2 votes for the popular win and then have every congressional district within the state be worth another vote. I'm not a fan of the winner take all thing.
Ideally, first past the post should be eliminated, but that'll never happen because it would threaten to take power from the two parties in charge.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
jamiethekiller wrote:i want to cry when i think about a 6-3 supreme court and all the irreversible damage its going to do.