The former Pennsylvania senator who won the 2012 caucuses saw his single-digit public poll tallies reflected in the night's results. He won support from 1 percent of GOP voters, or 1,783 votes.
That put him at the back of the pack, trailing all but the 119 votes for "other" and the 12 votes for little-known former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore.
Adding insult to injury, MSNBC talked to a Santorum precinct captain who said he failed to vote for Santorum at his own caucus site.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:Clinton did really well with older Dem voters. As we all know, they are the ones who vote. Great showing by Sanders but I just don't think it is something that can last.
pacino wrote:btw, this is how few votes we are actuallydealing with in Iowa:The former Pennsylvania senator who won the 2012 caucuses saw his single-digit public poll tallies reflected in the night's results. He won support from 1 percent of GOP voters, or 1,783 votes.
That put him at the back of the pack, trailing all but the 119 votes for "other" and the 12 votes for little-known former Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore.
Adding insult to injury, MSNBC talked to a Santorum precinct captain who said he failed to vote for Santorum at his own caucus site.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
CalvinBall wrote:The coronation of rubio in this thread is a bit premature. He is polling in the single digits in New Hampshire. Primaries are different than these weird ass caucuses.
The Crimson Cyclone wrote:O'Malley and Huckabee both dropped out
SK790 wrote:CalvinBall wrote:The coronation of rubio in this thread is a bit premature. He is polling in the single digits in New Hampshire. Primaries are different than these weird ass caucuses.
To piggy back off of this, anyone else think caucuses are stupid as #$!&@?
traderdave wrote:SK790 wrote:CalvinBall wrote:The coronation of rubio in this thread is a bit premature. He is polling in the single digits in New Hampshire. Primaries are different than these weird ass caucuses.
To piggy back off of this, anyone else think caucuses are stupid as #$!&@?
I think Pacino has made his views on caucuses pretty clear.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
TomatoPie wrote: Carly has become irrelevant in this race.
drsmooth wrote:TomatoPie wrote: Carly has become irrelevant in this race.
Her "irrelevance" is the irrelevance of the R party on the national stage, apoplectically against all manner of things and only for obviously insane things ("let's make the military 10X its present size, and of course not pay for any of it!"; "death to immigrants!")