Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

by **Houshphandzadeh** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 14:32:54

Friends should have gone darker

by **Youseff** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 14:36:13

CalvinBall wrote:im not following anyone. the whole colbert crusade you had going on then you glibly use retard for a cheap laugh. was trying to point that out. but if you dont see the similarities then i cant force you to.

if you read the twitter libtard is very ubiquitous as a disparaging remark, which is what td11 was mocking, if it wasn't clear. there are variations including libturd (way more PC) and libpuke which is getting pretty thin on the play on words. these go hand in hand with the obungler and obummer labeling.

by **jerseyhoya** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 14:40:32

td11 wrote:
jerseyhoya wrote:
td11 wrote:i was not "going on" and i also was not showing "rage" (which, by the way, is akin to telling someone to "calm down" during a serious argument, pretty condescending). my posts were set off by jerz posting "faux outrage on faux outrage." i have since said that Suey Park seems nuts but that the original tweet was still a bad idea and offensive out of context.

sorry for using the word i used earlier today. other people have used it recently and not in an obviously sarcastic way.

Except I didn't say that but whatever

jerseyhoya wrote:The #cancelcolbert thing really is the worst of social media. Outrage and faux outrage and outrage and faux outrage about the outrage and faux outrage.

Right, outrage and faux outrage. Because some people were actually offended and others were doing the stomping feet on the internet pretending to be upset just to get attention thing. And that people took offense to me saying that is crazy.

by **CalvinBall** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 14:42:08

Youseff wrote:
CalvinBall wrote:im not following anyone. the whole colbert crusade you had going on then you glibly use retard for a cheap laugh. was trying to point that out. but if you dont see the similarities then i cant force you to.

if you read the twitter libtard is very ubiquitous as a disparaging remark, which is what td11 was mocking, if it wasn't clear. there are variations including libturd (way more PC) and libpuke which is getting pretty thin on the play on words. these go hand in hand with the obungler and obummer labeling.

you are missing the point.

td and i are on the same page now so im done.

by **td11** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 14:57:09

jerseyhoya wrote:
td11 wrote:
jerseyhoya wrote:
td11 wrote:i was not "going on" and i also was not showing "rage" (which, by the way, is akin to telling someone to "calm down" during a serious argument, pretty condescending). my posts were set off by jerz posting "faux outrage on faux outrage." i have since said that Suey Park seems nuts but that the original tweet was still a bad idea and offensive out of context.

sorry for using the word i used earlier today. other people have used it recently and not in an obviously sarcastic way.

Except I didn't say that but whatever

jerseyhoya wrote:The #cancelcolbert thing really is the worst of social media. Outrage and faux outrage and outrage and faux outrage about the outrage and faux outrage.

Right, outrage and faux outrage. Because some people were actually offended and others were doing the stomping feet on the internet pretending to be upset just to get attention thing. And that people took offense to me saying that is crazy.

Pretty nitpicky but whatever

by **Napalm** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:06:10

Houshphandzadeh wrote:Friends should have gone darker

right. maybe a suicide

by **CalvinBall** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:11:12

that would have been real. would have been their jesse spano caffeine pill episode.

by **Youseff** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:15:51

CalvinBall wrote:
Youseff wrote:
CalvinBall wrote:im not following anyone. the whole colbert crusade you had going on then you glibly use retard for a cheap laugh. was trying to point that out. but if you dont see the similarities then i cant force you to.

if you read the twitter libtard is very ubiquitous as a disparaging remark, which is what td11 was mocking, if it wasn't clear. there are variations including libturd (way more PC) and libpuke which is getting pretty thin on the play on words. these go hand in hand with the obungler and obummer labeling.

you are missing the point.

td and i are on the same page now so im done.

I didn't read most of the thread, to be fair

by **Youseff** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:23:34

just read the thread.

by **Barry Jive** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:35:43

Napalm wrote:
Houshphandzadeh wrote:Friends should have gone darker

right. maybe a suicide

Chandler drug overdose probably could have happened at any point really

by **Soren** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:39:07

by **td11** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:39:14

CalvinBall wrote:
Youseff wrote:
CalvinBall wrote:im not following anyone. the whole colbert crusade you had going on then you glibly use retard for a cheap laugh. was trying to point that out. but if you dont see the similarities then i cant force you to.

if you read the twitter libtard is very ubiquitous as a disparaging remark, which is what td11 was mocking, if it wasn't clear. there are variations including libturd (way more PC) and libpuke which is getting pretty thin on the play on words. these go hand in hand with the obungler and obummer labeling.

you are missing the point.

td and i are on the same page now so im done.

Don't need to or want to beef about this anymore but we're definitely not on the same page.

The fact remains that this is 99.99999% white message board, do you think this glaring lack of diversity has some effect on the collective groupthink? Is it really that offensive when I respond to a bunch of white guys who have no personal stake in an issue that their dismissal of people's feelings as just being faux outrage is itself offensive?

I guess you think you've made some grand point about me being a hypocrite but pointing out my clearly over the top usage of libtard while ignoring other boarders who've used it earnestly seems vapid at best (you're basically suey park going after Stephen Colbert instead of Dan Snyder ;-)

). Not to mention I don't ever use it to actually attack people or denigrate mentally challenged people.

I'm sorry if I made you feel like you shouldn't express your opinion. That was lazy.

And just so its clear I don't think you're a racist or anything close to it and it doesn't bother me to be questioned so I don't want you to feel like you're stepping on any toes.

by **Soren** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:39:56

Soren wrote:

by **td11** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:41:15

Fuxk I meant to send that as a pm

by **td11** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:41:28

Fycking phome

by **Youseff** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:43:55

what is with td11 that guy is a bozo and I hope he steps into a muddy puddle at some point

by **Youseff** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:44:09

Fuxk I meant to send that as a pm to werthless

by **td11** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:47:02

Youseff wrote:what is with td11 that guy is a bozo and I hope he steps into a muddy puddle at some point

Waiting on a haircut gonna ask for an extra long shampoo :Noah.jpg:

by **Soren** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:48:42

Soren wrote:
Soren wrote:

by **Soren** » Fri Apr 04, 2014 15:50:20

Alexis Beldel was 19 when the Gilmore Girls first came on the air and she legit looked about 12.

Archived

Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS

Re: Tater tots whom RANDOM THOUGHTS