Werthless wrote:drsmooth wrote:The ACA doomsday news seems to have died down
Personally, I'm waiting for the cost data. The news that only 24% of signups were ages 18-35, instead of the expected 38%, is not meaningful in isolation. It's only meaningful insofar as the impact on cost.
I've explained elsewhere (earlier in this post? in the health reform thread?) why enrollments will have negligible impact on cost
So that 14% differential is meaningful neither in isolation or insofar as the impact on cost (which seems like a malformed expression, but there's probably something to it I am missing)