Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby Werthless » Wed Jan 23, 2013 17:13:52

Bucky wrote:it's sort of how i feel about guns. They'd be OK if they always end up in the right hands, but they don't, so restrict. Just like gerrymandering.

That's interesting. I think about the availability of guns from the exact opposite perspective. Restricting it would mainly reduce the guns being held by responsible owners, so don't ban. (I know you didnt say ban, but restrict, which I support)

Werthless
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 12968
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 16:07:07

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby Werthless » Wed Jan 23, 2013 17:14:50

TenuredVulture wrote:Let's face it. Delaware is a rotten borough.

There have been threads about this. It's something we can all agree on. Darn mooches.

Werthless
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 12968
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 16:07:07

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby drsmooth » Wed Jan 23, 2013 17:44:59

Werthless wrote:
Bucky wrote:it's sort of how i feel about guns. They'd be OK if they always end up in the right hands, but they don't, so restrict. Just like gerrymandering.

That's interesting. I think about the availability of guns from the exact opposite perspective. Restricting it would mainly reduce the guns being held by responsible owners, so don't ban. (I know you didnt say ban, but restrict, which I support)


let's not pretend any discussion of "gun bans" has to do with deer rifles or other pop guns. The serious discussion is about managing the manufacture & sale of mass murder weapons a little better than we do now, going forward. No civilian needs to own or use one. And no one's even talking about going to get any that gun fondlers already possess, bleating from idiots like shriveldick Mitch McConnell notwithstanding.
Yes, but in a double utley you can put your utley on top they other guy's utley, and you're the winner. (Swish)

drsmooth
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 47349
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:24:48
Location: Low station

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby td11 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 17:48:03

shriveldick, i like it
td11
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 35802
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 03:04:40

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby jerseyhoya » Wed Jan 23, 2013 18:53:23

TenuredVulture wrote:I'm not convinced that gerrymandering for any purpose is as evil as many seem to think. Why should geography trump all other considerations when it comes to representation? Gerrymandering can be a way to move toward proportional representation by other means. Gerrymandering can ensure minorities have a voice. Yes, the devil is in the details, and who gets to draw those maps. But the politics of redistricting are a lot more complicated than the discussion here would indicate. There's nothing wrong with gerrymandering per se.

It's also important to note that the clever people who do the gerrymandering often outsmart themselves--things don't always go according to expectations.

I think the reason redistricting is complicated is there's no ideal way to do it. And various ways are worse than others depending on relatively subjective criteria of what the goals of districts should be.

So you want an independent commission to take on redistricting. Do they only take compactness and other natural boundaries into account? Should they try and draw districts that ensure minority representation (pluses and minuses of this have been discussed)? Ought commissions try and make districts politically competitive to ensure more heated races and 'healthier' democracy (democratic responsiveness is pretty important in a democracy)? Should they attempt to split the districts into partisan strongholds so the makeup of the delegation approximates the partisan breakdown of the state (there's a segment of the literature that suggests democratic attitudes are enhanced when larger percentages of citizens support their representative)? Should they consider where current incumbents live to enhance the state's clout in Washington or because longtime representatives are better at the job than new ones (this is what the professor who was the tiebreaking vote on NJ's legislative redistricting panel this go around aimed for)? Many of the goals are mutually exclusive.

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby drsmooth » Wed Jan 23, 2013 19:27:32

in the abstract redistricting seems much like a network load-balancing exercise. Any pol sci wonkerers ever take that model and run to postgrad research paper daylight with it?
Yes, but in a double utley you can put your utley on top they other guy's utley, and you're the winner. (Swish)

drsmooth
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 47349
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:24:48
Location: Low station

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby TenuredVulture » Wed Jan 23, 2013 20:25:39

I don't have a problem with a politicized redistricting process, precisely for the reasons laid out in Doc Smooth's post. Maybe one day we can all use the internet to attach ourselves as voters to any district we like. Imagine the strategery. Do I join a district with a bunch like minded wussie pinkos? Or do I try to subvert a district full of knuckle dragging right wing neanderthals?
Be Bold!

TenuredVulture
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 53243
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 00:16:10
Location: Magnolia, AR

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby dajafi » Wed Jan 23, 2013 23:29:06

TenuredVulture wrote:Dajafi, rules are never neutral with respect to outcome.


This is why I shouldn't post while in the bathroom at work. Then again, that's probably the setting (and the inspiration, and the obvious metaphor) for most of what I've written at BSG since rejoining the ranks of the full-time (and then some) employed three years back.

What I meant was that the "classic" electoral college wasn't designed to favor the Republicans, or the Democrats. The idea of allocating EVs by congressional district obviously is a rule designed to create an outcome. Like, I dunno, saying a gun license is acceptable ID for voting purposes but a student ID is not.

As for the redistricting question, jh pretty much frames the big issues. My bias would be toward maximally competitive districts, though I get that this entails design problems too. (If you have two geographically coherent districts both around 60/40, do you redraw them to produce one closer to 50/50 and another where one party has a huge advantage, or leave as is?) I just think that more contested races, all else equal, tend to boost participation, and that the fear of getting knocked off by someone of the other party rather than someone more extreme in your own is a better incentive when it comes to policymaking, which ultimately is the point of winning in the first place.

dajafi
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 24567
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 20:03:18
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby jerseyhoya » Thu Jan 24, 2013 01:23:19

Venezuela's vice president says he's target of assassination plot - New regime starting to try and consolidate support and take the banner of Chavismo by imagining threats. How lovely.

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby pacino » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:06:40

WOMEN BE FIGHTIN' NOW
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby pacino » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:30:54

libertarianism in Japan:
Taro Aso, Japan's newly appointed deputy prime minister and minister for finance and financial services, speaks during a news conference at the prime minister's official residence in Tokyo, Japan, Dec. 27, 2012. (Kiyoshi Ota/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

TOKYO – Taro Aso has never been one to hold his tongue. But Japan’s 72 year-old deputy prime minister may have outdone himself with his latest gaffe.

At a government panel to discuss social security reforms, the former prime minister called the elderly who are unable to feed themselves “tube people,” then proceeded to say the elderly should be allowed to “hurry up and die” to reduce the burden on a country tasked to pay for their medical expenses.

Adding his personal experience, Aso said he had already written a will, directing his family to let him “hurry up and die,” refusing end-of-life care.

“Even if (doctors) said they could keep me alive, it would be unbearable,” he said. “I would feel guilty, knowing that (treatment) was being paid for by the government.”

Aso later argued that his comments were misinterpreted. He was speaking about his personal wishes, not those of all senior citizens.

In 2008, while still prime minister, Aso called the elderly a “feeble” group.

“Why should I have to pay taxes for people who just sit around and do nothing but eat and drink?” he said at the time.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby jerseyhoya » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:35:35

We need more people like that in America

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby pacino » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:50:33

are you joking
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby jerseyhoya » Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:51:09

End of life care costs too damn much. Bring me death panels.

jerseyhoya
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 97408
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 21:56:17

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby TenuredVulture » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:06:05

Having seen what happens at the end of life for many people, I can tell you that the system is expensive and fucked. it's probably in the neighborhood of 75k to be warehoused in a nursing home. And that's before you receive any medical treatment. And considering that the staff of a nursing home largely consists of CNAs and such making probably 8-9 an hour supervised by an RN making maybe double that, someone is making huge piles of cash of this deal.

While I'm ambivalent about euthanasia in cases of late stage Alzheimer's, if it were me in that position, I'd want someone to smother me with a pillow. Keeping someone alive in that state is cruel--we don't treat our pets that way.

As an aside, I do think that Kevorkian really fucked up the debate about end of life care almost as bad as the Catholic church.
Be Bold!

TenuredVulture
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 53243
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 00:16:10
Location: Magnolia, AR

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby pacino » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:26:19

he's against all elderly who dont make as much money as him, regardless of their medical fitness
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby drsmooth » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:26:50

jerseyhoya wrote:End of life care costs too damn much. Bring me death panels.


Double-dip: Only issue licences for AR15's to octogenarians
Yes, but in a double utley you can put your utley on top they other guy's utley, and you're the winner. (Swish)

drsmooth
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 47349
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 19:24:48
Location: Low station

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby pacino » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:28:42

drsmooth wrote:
jerseyhoya wrote:End of life care costs too damn much. Bring me death panels.


Double-dip: Only issue licences for AR15's to octogenarians

texas is already seeking to arm the kids. the only people without guns will now be liberal pussies. we'll all be safer for it. i hear more guns = less violence.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby Werthless » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:25:26

pacino wrote:
drsmooth wrote:
jerseyhoya wrote:End of life care costs too damn much. Bring me death panels.


Double-dip: Only issue licences for AR15's to octogenarians

texas is already seeking to arm the kids. the only people without guns will now be liberal pussies. we'll all be safer for it. i hear more guns = less violence.

Wow, really? Link?

Werthless
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 12968
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 16:07:07

Re: Sequestering The Night Away - Politics

Postby pacino » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:36:38

i was being a bit flippant, but:

This week’s gunfire at a Houston-area college prompted new calls Wednesday for allowing concealed handgun license holders to carry their weapons into Texas college buildings and classrooms as a measure of self-defense.

Texas lawmakers already are considering a bill that allows concealed handguns in college classrooms. A similar measure failed in 2011, but last month’s shooting at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn., had already helped renew the debate over safety in schools, and Tuesday’s gunfire at Lone Star College had supporters looking to rally more support.

“It levels the playing field,” in terms of safety, said Sen. Donna Campbell, R-New Braunfels. “We have to allow people the option for self-protection.”

And if the shooter at Lone Star College had turned the gun on others “and blasted folks ... I would have been thankful if somebody with a concealed handgun would have shot the people killing innocent folks,” Campbell said.

Authorities have charged 22-year-old Carlton Berry with two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Officials say an argument between Berry and another man escalated into gunfire that injured them and a maintenance worker.

Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst has proposed spending state money to give teachers and other school personnel weapons and tactical response training.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

PreviousNext