slugsrbad wrote:drsmooth wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Long been predisposed to dislike Chris Matthews because he went to LaSalle, but I would hit him in the face with a baseball bat without any qualms at all. What a #$!&@ cap on an embarrassing 5 year run for him.
he's an entertainer
meanwhile felonious sociopaths like rick scott GOVERN AMERICAN STATES
but they're fine; they're on your team
One is elected by his people, and the other is an ass hat who long ago went off the deep end. I cannot stand Gov. Scott, his actions are downright reprehensible, but he's an easier pill to swallow due to being elected. "Entertainers" like Matthews and Limbaugh are the true threats since they speak to the malleable masses.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
It is hard to believe how far we have fallen and it is not without design. We have become a nation of takers not producers. Our schools teach entitlement not patriotism. We have not held our elected officials to the standards that our founders set.They have not secured the wealth and liberty of the populace, but instead stole the the labor of the productive to feed those less deserving. Under this current President those receiving welfare payments rose 32% and those receiving food stamps is up 70%. They were purchased by the President, with our money, for political gain. He then purchased the union vote with our money. I believe we crossed over the tipping point where we are now only a few short years from becoming Greece. The loss of economic freedom is now threatening the very foundations of our once great nation. Those of us that have been sounding the alarm for the last 20 years have been soundly rejected by the lesser educated masses whose only goal now appears to be the destruction of the rule of law and the nation. God save the USA. This is our last hope.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
pacino wrote:slugsrbad wrote:drsmooth wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Long been predisposed to dislike Chris Matthews because he went to LaSalle, but I would hit him in the face with a baseball bat without any qualms at all. What a #$!&@ cap on an embarrassing 5 year run for him.
he's an entertainer
meanwhile felonious sociopaths like rick scott GOVERN AMERICAN STATES
but they're fine; they're on your team
One is elected by his people, and the other is an ass hat who long ago went off the deep end. I cannot stand Gov. Scott, his actions are downright reprehensible, but he's an easier pill to swallow due to being elected. "Entertainers" like Matthews and Limbaugh are the true threats since they speak to the malleable masses.
i think that's completely false. Scott is a crook who is currently running a state. Matthews and Limbaugh (false equivalence) say stuff into mics.
A salient fact about non-metaphorical cliffs is that falling over them is generally irreversible. If the cliff is high enough that falling off of it would kill you, then if you fall off you're going to die and that's the end of it. The "fiscal cliff" by contrast isn't like that at all.
Rather, it's a set of policy changes—mostly tax hikes plus some steep spending cuts—that if they were all locked into place would constitute a significant drag on economic growth over the course of a year. But if the Bush tax cuts fully expire on a Tuesday morning it's not as if some catastrophe strikes on Wednesday where suddenly middle class families have no money. It's true that if the new higher rates were to be locked in, then the medium-term drag on middle class take home pay would delay the deleveraging cycle and damage the recovery. But to resolve that, all you need to do is introduce a new package of middle class tax cuts on Wednesday afternoon, have congress pass it on Thursday, and then the president signs it on Friday. The fact that taxes were higher for three days—or even three weeks—is simply not that consequential.
Obviously to the extent that higher middle class taxes is bad, one day of them is worse than zero days and three days is worse than one day. But it's a deeply banal situation. There's no particularly large virtue to "averting" the fiscal cliff on Day N-3 versus "going over the fiscal cliff" and then fixing it in retrospect on Day N+3. If "going over the cliff" gives the White House leverage to lock a better medium-term fiscal policy in place, then going over the cliff is a no brainer. Because there is no cliff.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
dajafi wrote:Basically you should get Werthless installed as head of the RNC.
Libertarian activists need to set aside their decades-old knee-jerk reactions to the two major parties, roll up their sleeves, and make the Republican and Democratic parties more libertarian. When it comes to voting, libertarians need to get serious about liberty and give up on the Libertarian Party.
Barry Jive wrote:he's in our alumni HOF along with such greats as Tom Gola and Paul Arizin
With neither side backing down, senior producers had to find a way to split the difference. One idea was for two members of the decision team, Mishkin and Fox’s digital politics editor Chris Stirewalt, to go on camera with Megyn Kelly and Bret Baier to squelch the doubts over the call. But then it was decided that Kelly would walk through the office and interview the decision team in the conference room. “This is Fox News,” an insider said, “so anytime there’s a chance to show off Megyn Kelly’s legs they’ll go for it.” The decision desk were given a three-minute warning that Kelly would be showing up.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
A Tennessee Republican congressman won re-election on Tuesday overcoming revelations that he once had an affair with a patient and urged her to get an abortion.
Rep. Scott DesJarlais, a Jasper physician before going to Congress, beat Democratic challenger Eric Stewart on Tuesday. With 76 percent of precincts reporting, DesJarlais had 111,988 votes, or 57 percent, compared with Stewart's 83,835 votes, or 43 percent.
DesJarlais, who opposes abortion rights, largely withdrew from public sight a month ago after news accounts based on his 2001 divorce emerged. His campaign used a heavy rotation of TV ads to link Stewart to President Barack Obama, an unpopular figure in the conservative 4th District.
It's the second time DesJarlais has overcome explosive allegations stemming from his divorce. During his first campaign in 2010, the Democratic incumbent ran ads based on court records that said DesJarlais repeatedly pulled the trigger of an unloaded gun outside his first wife's bedroom door and another time held a gun in his mouth for three hours
Read more: http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/D ... z2BdjCEVsq
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
But a precinct-by-precinct breakdown of the county vote shows that Obama carried Reading by a huge 13,508-vote margin. In city precincts, especially in the heavily Latino neighborhoods downtown, it was not unusual for Obama to capture more than 80 percent of the votes cast.
However, the votes were closer in outlying city precincts, such as the Wyomissing Park and Hampden Heights sections, which are more suburbanlike and where Romney picked up as much as a third of the votes.
Still, the Republican candidate didn't win one of the city's 44 precincts.
Outside the city, it was a different story, with Romney taking all but a few of the remaining 155 suburban and rural precincts, which helped the GOP congressional incumbents and state House candidates.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
FTN wrote: im a dick towards everyone, you're not special.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.
Werthless wrote:dajafi wrote:Basically you should get Werthless installed as head of the RNC.
Affirmative action for minority libertarians? Unfortunately, I'm against most forms of affirmative action.
On a related note:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 26670.htmlLibertarian activists need to set aside their decades-old knee-jerk reactions to the two major parties, roll up their sleeves, and make the Republican and Democratic parties more libertarian. When it comes to voting, libertarians need to get serious about liberty and give up on the Libertarian Party.
jerseyhoya wrote:Long been predisposed to dislike Chris Matthews because he went to LaSalle, but I would hit him in the face with a baseball bat without any qualms at all. What a fucking cap on an embarrassing 5 year run for him.
jamiethekiller wrote:http://whitepeoplemourningromney.tumblr.com/
steady looking for jerseyhoya ala a wheres waldo book
The Nightman Cometh wrote:jerseyhoya wrote:Long been predisposed to dislike Chris Matthews because he went to LaSalle, but I would hit him in the face with a baseball bat without any qualms at all. What a fucking cap on an embarrassing 5 year run for him.
Deez nuts jersey, Deez nuts.
jamiethekiller wrote:http://whitepeoplemourningromney.tumblr.com/
steady looking for jerseyhoya ala a wheres waldo book