Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby CalvinBall » Wed Oct 17, 2012 16:26:48

put an obama sign in my yard. im all in.

CalvinBall
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 64951
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 15:30:02
Location: Pigslyvania

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby CalvinBall » Wed Oct 17, 2012 16:58:54

the dem running for state house in my district is bret BINDER.

CalvinBall
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
You've Got to Be Kidding Me!
 
Posts: 64951
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 15:30:02
Location: Pigslyvania

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby 702 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 17:03:59

CalvinBall wrote:put an obama sign in my yard. im all in.

Go C-Balls!

702
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 26255
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 16:41:34
Location: Vegas

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby Didn't I? » Wed Oct 17, 2012 17:21:09

CalvinBall wrote:put an obama sign in my yard. im all in.


Saw that you posted again right after this and expected it to say, "Aaaaaand my Obama sign's been stolen."
​​"Big Dick Nick stepped the fuck up." - An Eagles fan with an eye patch

Didn't I?
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 6570
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 19:29:17
Location: Brooklyn, NY

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby Phan In Phlorida » Wed Oct 17, 2012 18:42:38

jerseyhoya wrote:Mark Blumenthal ‏@MysteryPollster
CBS News KN poll of 500 uncommitted voters. Who won? Obama 37, Romney 30, Tie 33

That's fine. Wonder what CNN's of everyone will say.

This afternoon, CNN polls and pundits claim debate was a virtual tie, with Romney winning domestic issues (economy, tax plan, etc.) handily.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Phan In Phlorida
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 12571
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:51:57
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby Phan In Phlorida » Wed Oct 17, 2012 18:45:12

TenuredVulture wrote:
pacino wrote:how do you think bush feels right about now? ouch

I think Bush believes that Jan 20, 2009 was the greatest day of his life and he's glad he doesn't have to put up with this nonsense anymore. He's apparently taking up painting--mostly pictures of dogs and landscapes.


Image
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Phan In Phlorida
Space Cadet
Space Cadet
 
Posts: 12571
Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 03:51:57
Location: 22 Acacia Avenue

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby Roger Dorn » Wed Oct 17, 2012 18:58:42

I wish someone would call out Obama over the fact that his Administration has been more aggressive than the Bush Administration in raiding and shutting down state sanctioned and legal medicinal marijuana dispensaries.

Over the past 3 years the DOJ has raided over 200 legal medical marijuana facilities,and believe it or not that's DOUBLE the rate of the Bush Administration.

What a crock, nothing like undermining the 10th Amendment and saying Fuck You to the states who had their own processes in place to regulate what the legislatures and people of those states democratically decided they wanted. Not to mention a big Fuck You to the patients who could actually use it.

Hope and Change.

Roger Dorn
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 00:46:03

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby td11 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 19:08:33

fully agree on that one, roger. state of delaware was all set to open up 3 medical clinics and they got a notice from the feds that the people employed there would be arrested if they tried to open shop. markell had to put a hold on the plans after having gotten no indication from the feds that they would come down on it this hard.
td11
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 35802
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 03:04:40

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby kimbatiste » Wed Oct 17, 2012 19:22:11

Agreed on principle. But realistically, anyone who wouldn't vote for Obama because of this alone is probably too much a pothead to remember to make it to the polls anyway.

kimbatiste
Dropped Anchor
Dropped Anchor
 
Posts: 7104
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 23:32:27

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby Roger Dorn » Wed Oct 17, 2012 19:28:47

kimbatiste wrote:Agreed on principle. But realistically, anyone who wouldn't vote for Obama because of this alone is probably too much a pothead to remember to make it to the polls anyway.


Right, it just irks me that states have a democratic process in place, whether it be ballot initative, referendum, etc., and the Feds just swoop in and ends it right there. People who really could use it suffer, and its a shame.

What's also a shame is that both parties are prisoners to the big pharma lobby, and of course marijuana is a huge threat and competition for them so it makes sense.

Roger Dorn
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 00:46:03

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby JFLNYC » Wed Oct 17, 2012 19:38:47

Phan In Phlorida wrote:with Romney winning domestic issues (economy, tax plan, etc.) handily.


Seriously?
Jamie

"A man who tells lies . . . merely hides the truth. But a man who tells half-lies has forgotten where he put it."

JFLNYC
BSG MVP
BSG MVP
 
Posts: 34322
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 13:16:48
Location: Location, Location!

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby pacino » Wed Oct 17, 2012 19:57:33

CalvinBall wrote:put an obama sign in my yard. im all in.

my one roomie doesnt vote and the other isnt political but will vote. don't think i should overstep my bounds that way.

good going though, cballs
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby pacino » Wed Oct 17, 2012 19:58:59

Roger Dorn wrote:I wish someone would call out Obama over the fact that his Administration has been more aggressive than the Bush Administration in raiding and shutting down state sanctioned and legal medicinal marijuana dispensaries.

Over the past 3 years the DOJ has raided over 200 legal medical marijuana facilities,and believe it or not that's DOUBLE the rate of the Bush Administration.

What a crock, nothing like undermining the 10th Amendment and saying #$!&@ You to the states who had their own processes in place to regulate what the legislatures and people of those states democratically decided they wanted. Not to mention a big #$!&@ You to the patients who could actually use it.

Hope and Change.

the problem is that both party's bigwigs appear to agree that it's something they dont want to go against law enforcement about. about half of the democratic party and a few republicans who are libertarians are for not being aholes and stupid, but none of them seem to hold power.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby pacino » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:01:05

Roger Dorn wrote:
kimbatiste wrote:Agreed on principle. But realistically, anyone who wouldn't vote for Obama because of this alone is probably too much a pothead to remember to make it to the polls anyway.


Right, it just irks me that states have a democratic process in place, whether it be ballot initative, referendum, etc., and the Feds just swoop in and ends it right there. People who really could use it suffer, and its a shame.

What's also a shame is that both parties are prisoners to the big pharma lobby, and of course marijuana is a huge threat and competition for them so it makes sense.

i agree as for some cancer patients and chronic pain patients it is the ONLY thing that truly helps; however, i am less for medical marijuana as a permanent thing and more for it as a step in teh door to just full legalization. i just don't care if you want to get blitzed drinking EW and coke zero or a bong.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby td11 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:09:11

If joe Biden was rude to Paul Ryan, romney last night was way worse. He has no respect for the president.
td11
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 35802
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 03:04:40

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby pacino » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:09:46

td11 wrote:If joe Biden was rude to Paul Ryan, romney last night was way worse. He has no respect for the president.

uh, td? why did you just post? YOU'LL GET YOUR TURN, BOY
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby td11 » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:10:36

Please proceed, pacino
td11
Plays the Game the Right Way
Plays the Game the Right Way
 
Posts: 35802
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 03:04:40

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby pacino » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:18:38

thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby Roger Dorn » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:23:40

pacino wrote:
Roger Dorn wrote:
kimbatiste wrote:Agreed on principle. But realistically, anyone who wouldn't vote for Obama because of this alone is probably too much a pothead to remember to make it to the polls anyway.


Right, it just irks me that states have a democratic process in place, whether it be ballot initative, referendum, etc., and the Feds just swoop in and ends it right there. People who really could use it suffer, and its a shame.

What's also a shame is that both parties are prisoners to the big pharma lobby, and of course marijuana is a huge threat and competition for them so it makes sense.

i agree as for some cancer patients and chronic pain patients it is the ONLY thing that truly helps; however, i am less for medical marijuana as a permanent thing and more for it as a step in teh door to just full legalization. i just don't care if you want to get blitzed drinking EW and coke zero or a bong.


Agree 100% with this. Change occurs at a snails place in the U.S., so in my mind the first step is fully legalize medicinal. If it was up to me the Drug War would end yesterday.

Roger Dorn
There's Our Old Friend
There's Our Old Friend
 
Posts: 2602
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 00:46:03

Re: Binders Full of Woman: Politics Thread

Postby pacino » Wed Oct 17, 2012 20:29:40

Roger Dorn wrote:
pacino wrote:
Roger Dorn wrote:
kimbatiste wrote:Agreed on principle. But realistically, anyone who wouldn't vote for Obama because of this alone is probably too much a pothead to remember to make it to the polls anyway.


Right, it just irks me that states have a democratic process in place, whether it be ballot initative, referendum, etc., and the Feds just swoop in and ends it right there. People who really could use it suffer, and its a shame.

What's also a shame is that both parties are prisoners to the big pharma lobby, and of course marijuana is a huge threat and competition for them so it makes sense.

i agree as for some cancer patients and chronic pain patients it is the ONLY thing that truly helps; however, i am less for medical marijuana as a permanent thing and more for it as a step in teh door to just full legalization. i just don't care if you want to get blitzed drinking EW and coke zero or a bong.


Agree 100% with this. Change occurs at a snails place in the U.S., so in my mind the first step is fully legalize medicinal. If it was up to me the Drug War would end yesterday.

yes. it seems to me that much of the american public votes conservative economically, even if i dont agree, so the republican party would be wise to disband itself from its super right-wing religious element and just dominate our politics. but, they try to rile up the base with social issues and alienate a lot of young voters who may not agree with more liberal economic views. i just dont get why they do that???? i'm a liberal, but i know lots of younger (under 35) voters that would vote republican if they didn't have so many damned anti-drug and anti-gay politicians in power.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.

Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.

pacino
Moderator / BSG MVP
Moderator / BSG MVP
 
Posts: 75831
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 18:37:20
Location: Furkin Good

PreviousNext