Youseff wrote:store round the corner from me wants to sell expired meat, but them precious liberal health inspectors wont let them. THOUGHT THIS WAS THE USA??
Bucky wrote:AND SEE WHAT IT DID TO YOUR BRAIN IT MADE YOU A REPUBLICAN
Werthless wrote:Youseff wrote:store round the corner from me wants to sell expired meat, but them precious liberal health inspectors wont let them. THOUGHT THIS WAS THE USA??
I eat meat that is months overdue because I freeze it.
Youseff wrote:... in movie theaters ...
Phan In Phlorida wrote:Youseff wrote:... in movie theaters ...
How much impact would banning 31oz of ice and 1oz of soda really have?
Houshphandzadeh wrote:If I rode a bike, I would probably wear a helmet, but I would hate it so much
Barry Jive wrote:oh man, this thread took some pretty sick turns right there
I'm pretty down with letting people eat whatever they want but I really don't see a problem with taxing the shit out of it. It's not like healthcare and abortions are free
Werthless wrote:This is precious.
The liberals on this board (and those off it) are perfectly fine legislating restrictions on soda intake, cigarettes, bicycle helmets, speed limits, seat belts, etc, because they assert that society is better off without these behaviors (drinking large sodas, smoking, riding without a helmet, etc). That is the only standard! And yet, if conservatives try to pass laws that meet that standard ("It will make society better off"), the standard is not enough to justify taking away that choice. Everyone agrees that abortions are bad, so let's ban them. Ohhhh no, we can't do that; this is infringing upon the woman's right to do whatever the hell she wants to do with her body, including stopping the tiny heart beating inside her. But preventing her from putting 20oz of soda in her body, well, no, we liberals can prevent her from doing that. She doesnt control that choice. I don't understand how so many of you can vehemently defend freedom to abort fetuses but not freedom to eat whatever you want.
It makes me sad, more than anything else. That's why I posted my modified quote, that it's silly to defend a government seizing choice from you just because you agree with that choice. In my opinion, it's better to defend freedom whenever it is threatened.
thephan wrote:Houshphandzadeh wrote:If I rode a bike, I would probably wear a helmet, but I would hate it so much
It is a public service to wear a bucket so they can tell who you were with out the expense of dental record searches and DNA matches.