GrizzledVeteran wrote:How about that Chris Christie ordering flags in NJ to be lowered to half staff in honor of Whitney Houston. Really? REALLY?
"This contraception thing, my gosh, it's [so] inexpensive. You know, back in my days, they'd use Bayer aspirin for contraception. The gals put it between their knees and it wasn't that costly."
Werthless wrote:drsmooth wrote:Werthless wrote: I would guess that the majority of abortions have nothing to do with the health of the mother; a lifestyle choice. Abortions aren't "convenient," but kids are inconvenient.
smh
you would guess wrong
Surveys by Guttmacher Institute suggests otherwise. Table on p113. More mothers who got abortions named "don't want people to know I had sex or got pregnant" as a reason contributing to their decision for an abortion than "physical problems with my health" or "possible problems affecting the health of the baby."
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf
Note also that the Guttmacher institute studies regularly appear in Planned Parenthood publications, and they are a pro-choice organization dedicated to advancing sexual and reproductive health. This isn't some made-up study by pro-lifers.
Where are you getting your information?
RichmondPhilsFan wrote:Loving the VA politics discussion lately, even if I can't comment on it. Watched the Capitol Square personhood rally from my office window yesterday.
BTW, Todd Gilbert is a former prosecutor from northwest Virginia. Born in Texas, but I think he grew up in VA. So, he's probably not a Mets fan... good chance he's a Braves fan.
MoBettle wrote:http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-cohn/100798/foster-friess-girls-used-aspirin-birth-control-santorum-msnbc"This contraception thing, my gosh, it's [so] inexpensive. You know, back in my days, they'd use Bayer aspirin for contraception. The gals put it between their knees and it wasn't that costly."
I think the argument here is semantics over the word 'lifestyle'. I don't see how it boils down to anything more than the woman (or couple) does not believe they can properly parent a child at that time or does not want to parent a child at that time. Beyond extenuating circumstances such as health complications, rape etc. it comes down to two words; they're 'not ready'. Whether or not that means 'lifestyle' is slightly irrelevant.drsmooth wrote:Werthless wrote:drsmooth wrote:Werthless wrote: I would guess that the majority of abortions have nothing to do with the health of the mother; a lifestyle choice. Abortions aren't "convenient," but kids are inconvenient.
smh
you would guess wrong
Surveys by Guttmacher Institute suggests otherwise. Table on p113. More mothers who got abortions named "don't want people to know I had sex or got pregnant" as a reason contributing to their decision for an abortion than "physical problems with my health" or "possible problems affecting the health of the baby."
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3711005.pdf
Note also that the Guttmacher institute studies regularly appear in Planned Parenthood publications, and they are a pro-choice organization dedicated to advancing sexual and reproductive health. This isn't some made-up study by pro-lifers.
Where are you getting your information?
Guttmacher data is sound; your interpretations are not so much. Example: your apparent attempt to twist the passage you've quoted into a defense of your assertion that abortions are "lifestyle" decisions.
TenuredVulture wrote:My question with the flag thing is the extent to which Whitney Houston was associated with NJ. I mean, she is being buried there. Do people of Newark hold her as some kind of local girl who made good? Are there precedents? Did say Sinatra or Bud Abbott or Lou Costello or Vince Lombardi get the same treatment?
I sort of see the point if Whitney is being singled out. The policy in Arkansas seems to reserve it for soldiers who are killed in combat and maybe a few other important state figures. We didn't do it for Johnny Cash though.
The Nightman Cometh wrote:People get pregnant on birth control, believe it or not.
TenuredVulture wrote: Are there precedents? Did say Sinatra or Bud Abbott or Lou Costello or Vince Lombardi get the same treatment?
TenuredVulture wrote:Seems to me being against sex for fun is not a winning political position. I wonder when they'll go public with their thoughts about masturbation.
TenuredVulture wrote:Seems to me being against sex for fun is not a winning political position. I wonder when they'll go public with their thoughts about masturbation.
Werthless wrote:TenuredVulture wrote:Seems to me being against sex for fun is not a winning political position. I wonder when they'll go public with their thoughts about masturbation.
It wins the segment of the old vote that aren't having sex for fun.
thephan wrote:pacino's posting is one of the more important things revealed in weeks.
Calvinball wrote:Pacino was right.